Always an opinion based upon the wrong premise. The reason abortions were available in some states and not others is only a relative observation if the Supremes allow a return to status quo from 1960’s.
The real threat to the abortion industry (it’s always been about $$) is if the Supremes take up a case based upon when life begins (the heartbeat laws come close to forcing the issue).
A USSC decision or federal legislation/constitutional amendment declaring life begins at conception would render pre Roe laws moot.
This is the only decision not brought before the USSC. A Godly nation may not stand before a Holy God and deny life begins at conception. Only an ungodly nation may do so.
Our nation stands at the precipice and will repent and turn to God or step off the edge in worship of the creation in lieu of the Creator. Both choices will lead to possibly violent change with one ending in peace while the other ends in chaos. Choose wisely.....
WWG1WGA
A USSC decision or federal legislation/constitutional amendment declaring life begins at conception would render pre Roe laws moot.
Absolutely, once the embryo has it’s own DNA it’s
not a part of the mother to dispose as she wishes.
I’m just surprise there are not more legal actions
of the part of fathers, when a woman aborts a fetus
that contains the father’s DNA.
As it stands now a woman can destroy the off spring
of a male at her whim but carry it to term and suddenly
the male is responsible for it.