Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nikos1121

The explanation I heard (grain of salt), is that they were testing the setup for a shot where Baldwin fires the mean old gun while the camera is looking down the barrel; the person who was shot was looking either through the lens or very near the camera to see how the shot would look.

It was apparently very realistic.


18 posted on 10/27/2021 5:25:46 AM PDT by _longranger81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: _longranger81

That’s awful.

There really is no excuse for this when you think about it.

Why does Baldwin actually have to be the one to fire the gun?

the whole thing doesn’t add up, and there is no media out there to tell us what happened.


21 posted on 10/27/2021 5:31:09 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: _longranger81

Cinéma vérité - yeah, that’s the ticket!

How can an actor actually get into the spirit of the role unless the whole EXPERIENCE is first played out?


22 posted on 10/27/2021 5:33:24 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Guns don't kill people, Alec Baldwin kills people" - Donald Trump Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: _longranger81

That’s actually pretty standard, yes: Think of the beginning of any James Bond movie you’ve ever seen. He aims directly at the camera and fires. Blood pours down. As I commented above, Baldwin was their perfect stooge.


56 posted on 10/27/2021 10:15:11 AM PDT by Scarlett156 (#CowboysAndMoslems2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson