Posted on 10/23/2021 8:30:37 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
“They don’t scavenge.
That is a bald faced lie. You are a liar.
Ban the wolf hunt? There is NO WAY the wolves will comply. I doubt they can read, or would even recognize the legitimacy of the court if the could.
Those wolves will hunt.
They prefer live ones. They pass up on the dead one they’ve been working.
The wolves should be killed. I don’t want more wolves in America.
They need the wolves alive for the new Wisconsin petting zoos.
That is also a lie.
Wolves should be trapped and relocated into the judge’s community and the communities of those on the wildlife group.
Dude, grow up.
The wolf quota was 200. They harvested 218.
The Natural Resources Board set the next quota at 300, attempting to get the wolf population back toward the stated goal of 350. It is currently at about 1,000 or more. To bring the population down, they have to harvest at least 300 wolves, probably more than 400.
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which is governed by the board ignored the governing body and said we set the quota, not you, a first in Wisconsin history. Even the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel was shocked. It was done by the DNR with the cooperation of Governor Evers, I am sure.
Now the judge says "no hunt". It is all to screw the people in the rural North of Wisconsin, who are the ones who have to live with the wolves.
Dane County (Madison). That’s all you need to know.
“I wonder how many of these ‘animal activists’ who live in and around ‘The People’s Republic of Madiston’ and only see SQUIRRELS from their apartment windows, have lost their house pets and livestock to wolves?”
I got a letter from a university telling me I was in a zone where they were releasing wolves and they were seeking my input. There was a form, which was essentially a document telling me how to behave when I am confronted by “a wolf.” I wrote a long letter. Although my area is shown on the map as mostly forest, there are lots of school bus stops in and around the forest. There is really very little contiguous forest. And, if they are successful, I won’t be confronted by “a wolf.” Wolves are pack animals. And, what happens when a pack of wolves drag some child off from a bus stop? Our ancestors did not kill wolves because they were bad people. They killed wolves because wolves hunt people. I invited the sender of the letter to write or call so we could discuss it further. They did not take me up on it.
I live in a neighborhood of five acre farms. I can’t let my tough, large tomcat out at night because he’s pretty far down on the food chain. I often see signs “reward for Fluffy.” I’ve got news for them. Fluffy is most likely poop.
Filthy Dane County judge.
Get a clue.
Mine lives there, too - but she’s a meat eater and not against hunting and fishing.
“Ban the wolf hunt? There is NO WAY the wolves will comply. I doubt they can read, or would even recognize the legitimacy of the court if the could. Those wolves will hunt.”
LOL!
Thank you! Great addition to the thread. :)
Thanks—that is the better of the two, though the other one is still worth the read.
It tends to bring the ugly out in people like no other issue I've ever seen in Wisconsin.
I can only go by my experience. Owls killed off more of my lambs than anything else. At night they rip their skulls open, eat out their brains and soft tissues of the mouth like the tongue. Lambing season coincides with the owls brood hatching and they need to feed a nest of hungry owl chicks.
The People’s Republic of Madiston’ and only see SQUIRRELS from their apartment windows
—
They probably have never even seen a squirrel except on some TV Nature show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.