Replies

Pfizer ignored about 3000 'suspected Covid' cases and focused on just 200 trial participant's data in order to get their fake 95% 'efficacy' numbers. The 'vaccine' was never effective.

Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data January 4, 2021
bmj.com ^ | January 4, 2021 | Peter Doshi

1 posted on 10/22/2021 4:44:47 PM PDT by ransomnote

To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

2 posted on 10/22/2021 4:45:14 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

3 posted on 10/22/2021 4:48:25 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Back after a long hiatus. Now mygrandkidsgrandma)

And they’ll still kill you.

4 posted on 10/22/2021 4:50:05 PM PDT by SkyDancer (If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving)

You mean the fake vaccines don’t really work?

5 posted on 10/22/2021 4:52:58 PM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say it)

6 posted on 10/22/2021 4:55:04 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono

7 posted on 10/22/2021 4:57:03 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Fraud vitiates everything ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘𐡏⁻ )

And you won’t see this in the MSM, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube.

8 posted on 10/22/2021 5:05:43 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)

9 posted on 10/22/2021 5:08:59 PM PDT by silverleaf (“Freedom ultimately means the right of other people to do things that you disagree with”. T. Sowell )

The vaccines that are not really vaccines that may kill or maim.

Why are these still being given to anyone, human or animal, and why are they still mandated given what we know about this poison?

10 posted on 10/22/2021 5:09:30 PM PDT by Boomer (Leftism is a mental illness wrapped in a perverse ideology resulting in insanity. FJB)

To: ransomnote; Jane Long; metmom; MarvinStinson

(from the report):" The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work,
and actually make the recipients worse… by the week."

ransomnote :" Pfizer ignored about 3000 'suspected Covid' cases and focused on just 200 trial participant's data in order to get their fake 95% 'efficacy' numbers.
The 'vaccine' was never effective."

So the Federal Government paid over 9.5 Billion$ of dollars, for what ?
A statistical anomaly ?
Statistics don't lie , but statisticians and political do, right?
So, let's make the *vaxxines*, or "the jab" mandatory, even though they are authorized under emergency use only (UEA), and the Big Pharma companies are indemnified from lawsuit.
Let's have people lose their employment, mandate face masks, impose lock-downs while we crash the economy but the Big Pharma are held harmless due to a statistical anomaly ?
All this for a disease where the survival rate is 98.5% across all ages (??)
and we aren't even including allowances for side effects and collateral infections, and neurological damage which is directly related to "the jab".
What a FUBAR !

12 posted on 10/22/2021 5:19:04 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt

Just FYI... The article is using effectiveness vice efficacy. Efficacy is during trials and testing where effectiveness is the result of real world results.

15 posted on 10/22/2021 6:11:16 PM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794