Posted on 10/22/2021 4:44:47 PM PDT by ransomnote
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have a collective negative effictiveness in everyone over the age of 30 in the UK as low as minus-one-hundred-and-nine-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 30 in the UK as low as minus-one-hundred-and-twenty-four-percent.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.
Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.
Table 2 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published October 21st 2021, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 38 and week 41 of 2021. It also shows the confirmed case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.
Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency, which are as follows –
The effictiveness of all available vaccines combined is as low as minus-124% within the 40-49 age group, and as high as +25% in the 18-29 age group, the only age group other than under 18’s that the vaccines are currently showing to have a positive effectiveness.
This proves that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by the claimed 95%, and the fact the effectiveness of the vaccines has now surpassed the minus-100% barrier in everyone between the age of 40 and 79, suggests that it has completely decimated their immune systems, at least when it comes to infection from the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.
By combining the numbers provided for all age groups over the age of 18, we have been able to calculate an average vaccine effectiveness of minus-103%, and we’re definitely seeing this in the number of confirmed cases by vaccination status.
Between week 38 and week 41 of 2021 there were 63,691 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 18’s, 23,238 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 18’s, and a frightening 339,317 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 18’s.
The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work, and actually make the recipients worse… by the week.
Read and Share – ‘Deaths among children have increased by 52% against the five-year-average since they started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine after previously being 14% down’
Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data January 4, 2021
bmj.com ^ | January 4, 2021 | Peter Doshi
ping
Criminal
And they’ll still kill you.
You mean the fake vaccines don’t really work?
Bttt.
B💣💣M!
And you won’t see this in the MSM, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube.
Bump
The vaccines that are not really vaccines that may kill or maim.
Why are these still being given to anyone, human or animal, and why are they still mandated given what we know about this poison?
I do not think this word “ work” means what you think it means…
ransomnote :" Pfizer ignored about 3000 'suspected Covid' cases and focused on just 200 trial participant's data in order to get their fake 95% 'efficacy' numbers.
The 'vaccine' was never effective."
So the Federal Government paid over 9.5 Billion$ of dollars, for what ?
A statistical anomaly ?
Statistics don't lie , but statisticians and political do, right?
So, let's make the *vaxxines*, or "the jab" mandatory, even though they are authorized under emergency use only (UEA), and the Big Pharma companies are indemnified from lawsuit.
Let's have people lose their employment, mandate face masks, impose lock-downs while we crash the economy but the Big Pharma are held harmless due to a statistical anomaly ?
All this for a disease where the survival rate is 98.5% across all ages (??)
and we aren't even including allowances for side effects and collateral infections, and neurological damage which is directly related to "the jab".
What a FUBAR !
Ping !
YMMV
"History. Founded in November 2020 and based in the United Kingdom, The Daily Expose publishes Covid-19 conspiracy and anti-vaccination news.
The website completely lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page, disclose authors, editors, or owners..."
I will no longer relay any further report from the "daily Expose.uk " as their history and professional credentials are, and remain, unknown.
Always consider the source of your information.
Just FYI... The article is using effectiveness vice efficacy. Efficacy is during trials and testing where effectiveness is the result of real world results.
| Tilted Irish Kilt wrote: |
| Source : https://mediabiasfactcheck.com › the-daily-expose via Duckduckgo.com search "History. Founded in November 2020 and based in the United Kingdom, The Daily Expose publishes Covid-19 conspiracy and anti-vaccination news. I will no longer relay any further report from the "daily Expose.uk " as their history and professional credentials are, and remain, unknown. |
Tilted Irish Kilt Said: "Always consider the source of your information."
ransomnote said: Then why didn't you? You didn't check your censor's website before posting it, did you?
Here's your 'fact checker's' take on FReeRepublic:
"Free Republic’s users publish articles from a wide range of sources with some being on our questionable list for factual reporting, such as Breitbart, Gateway Pundit and even Rush Limbaugh who has a terrible record with fact-checkers."
Free Republic - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)
And at this link Least Biased - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com), your 'fact checker' says that the least biased reporting comes from API, APNEWS, the Council for Foreign Relations, the fake fact checker Fact Check (www.factcheck.org), Gallup, Harvard, North Korea Times (www.northkoreatimes.com), UPI, The US House of Representatives etc. Too many to count.
I would think you'd know by now the censors of all things conservative have set up fact checkers and scold us back into the censorship fold with them if we read content they don't like.
I would think you would consider the source of your information before telling us to do so.
“You had one job ...”|
I agree, and will be more vigilant in the future.
One learns more corrections from failure, rather than from one's successes.
🙌🏻
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.