Maybe you could, I don't know, search/locate/read the research behind the toxicity of graphene instead? Oh, but that's too much 'work', right? That would be contributing to the knowledge base and you don't do that kind of thing, right?
Well it's not too much work for me to find the article below and others and, you know, read them. Let the rest of us handle the 'hard part', too much for you.
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms [SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH Open Access - Copyright Free]
biomedcentral.com ^ | October 31, 2016 | Lingling Ou, Bin Song, Huimin Liang, Jia Liu, Xiaoli Feng, Bin Deng, Ting Sun & Longquan Shao
That statement is absurd on its face. Lightning bolts used to fly for lesser infractions!
Oh please. Magnetized humans being mind controlled by cell phone towers? I hear there are some good chemtrail threads out on the web. They would like something like this.
Not sure any amount of “work” researching, by anyone, is going to contribute value to the claim:
“Nano Graphene inside the cells is also making people extremely electrically conductive and paramagnetic, while opening them up to remote-access manipulation from wireless/5G radiation by linking them up to celltowers and supercomputing AI.”
Ransomenote - either support complete whack job crazy or don’t. Bold claims require bold evidence - dont expect non-crazy people to WASTE TIME to disprove remote access manipulation of people via 5G and AI.
It’s just crazy talk and should be ridiculed off any intelligent discussion forum…
Well it's not too much work for me to find the article below and others and, you know, read them. Let the rest of us handle the 'hard part', too much for you.
Some people are just not into comic books
Next thing we know, the "researchers" will find Kryptonite in the evil "jabs".
“Maybe you could, I don’t know, search/locate/read the research behind the toxicity of graphene instead?”
Graphene is just carbon. Pure carbon... It is not toxic. Search for the MSDS sheet on it.