What does Covid eventually become?
These people have no idea. I can nearly guarantee you that all mutational models used point in some direction already indicated by some related, already existing virus. And so they point at some . . . improvement for society, because already existing viruses didn’t become species threatening events.
So they have no idea. What is in this transcript is a description of what will happen if if if if if if.
It’s an artificial virus. There is zero information for modeling. It is as likely to become more deadly and more species threatening as it is to be less so.
People only talk about the less so. I suppose if they suggested a bad future they will be called stupid or political or whatever. But in the absence of precedent, bad vs good . . . equally likely.
Sadly, I think you are spot on.
I think you are correct.
And that is one of the driving forces regarding vaccination.
The question remains if the government had been originally forthcoming regarding the Wuhan Lab and Fauci’s involvement would the current attitudes and perspectives around the world be different?
Fauci needs to come clean regarding this artificial virus. Basic questions need to be answered:
Will it degrade overtime?
What was lab’s projection if used?
As we watch China lockdown a city of 4 million again, over 13 cases, what do we need to know from the CCP?
What was the protection standard assumed once released? Surely not just shutdowns/lockdowns?
And since it is artificially made, is there a neutralizing protocol being hidden from the world? It is obvious the vaccines are barely effective and likely cause significant harm in other ways from the actual virus, if they are the neutralizing protocol...what’s plan C?
The only one who can really answer this stuff is Fauci, Birx, Pence, Trump, Pelosi, McConnell and now Harris/Biden. I do believe they have knowledge regarding what is essentially a top secret bioweapon. Yes, we can say certain factions played politics with events, but we must also recognize the rest of the world’s response too.
Stepping back from the tree in front of us, we can see the forest. And the forest fires of politics being burned.
Years ago I joined a ping list regarding deadly diseases. At the time it was an ebola outbreak (not the one under 0bama) we were tracking. We really were not watching the disease itself, but the African country’s response to it. Our conclusion at the time was if there ever was a great event, bioweapon, outbreak our governments would indeed be less than truthful. And that conclusion has remained true regarding Sars-Cov-2.
Fauci said years ago in an interview:
“If you’re talking about a vaccine that’s truly useful and will have a substantial impact on the epidemic it’s going to be more than three years. The most you can hope for by then might be a vaccine to protect against disease progression rather than infection.” Fauci https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd2491
Which very much sounds like where we are right now.