Posted on 10/21/2021 12:13:12 AM PDT by ransomnote
PING
P4L
He needs to use clean slides, and/or a different method for transferring the fluid from the vials. Those are contaminants, but not from the vials.
Nephilim DNA?
As in the Days of Noah
❎
You’re absolutely certain about those details?
What’s their ID from the slide photos?
Because everybody knows those dirty Spanish scientists haven't discovered clean slides yet.
We're lucky to have you, Professor. And even more lucky that you looked at the vax in your lab.
Decades ago, during the initial investigation into the causative agent of toxic shock syndrome (associated with tampon use) a researcher announced he had found the causative organism and that it was a spirochete (a filamentous shaped bacterium - like Borrelia burgdorferi that causes Lyme, and Treponema pallidum - the spirochete that causes syphilis). Turns out it was a thread.
It never crossed my mind before, but this makes the low temp. (at or below freezing) of the vials, to keep whatever is in them from metastasis.
Maybe you can inform me...
In all the decades of looking at things under a microscope, how many "new" or "unknown" or "never been seen before" contaminants are still out there in a well-run laboratory?
If they are contaminants, wouldn't they be recognized?
If they are contaminants, wouldn't the scientists check for that and thoroughly sterilize the equipment and then look again?
If similar analysis is being done in different labs across the globe, would it be expected to have the same contaminants appear? Would it be possible to test the theory by having different labs look at the vaccines to see if they all see the same "contaminants?"
That's a theory that can be tested, right?
-PJ
Haha - I was laughing so hard reading that -Yep, Scientists in Spain just reuse slides they pull out of the trash. Maybe they go out to the barn and root around In the horse manure for lab equipment too -or buy it new at Dollar General
📌⬆
Good points
That picture just cracked me up thanks
That’s a theory that can be tested, right?
Wait..are you talking about using that thing that used to be called the scientific method? Not just consensus based outcomes?
Wow.
/s
This is a most interesting article...we should see the same results all over the world, one would think ...if we were interested in knowing.
A researcher so confident in his findings that he will not submit for peer review. Meh.
Many of these look like non-biological contamanants. I wonder if his samples are compromised.
I tend to agree. I used to teach microscopy way too many years ago and also did a lot of microscopy with asbestos, and most of that looks like dirty slides.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.