Because everybody knows those dirty Spanish scientists haven't discovered clean slides yet.
We're lucky to have you, Professor. And even more lucky that you looked at the vax in your lab.
He needs to use clean slides, and/or a different method for transferring the fluid from the vials. Those are contaminants, but not from the vials.
You’re absolutely certain about those details?
What’s their ID from the slide photos?
Because everybody knows those dirty Spanish scientists haven't discovered clean slides yet.
We're lucky to have you, Professor. And even more lucky that you looked at the vax in your lab.
Maybe you can inform me...
In all the decades of looking at things under a microscope, how many "new" or "unknown" or "never been seen before" contaminants are still out there in a well-run laboratory?
If they are contaminants, wouldn't they be recognized?
If they are contaminants, wouldn't the scientists check for that and thoroughly sterilize the equipment and then look again?
If similar analysis is being done in different labs across the globe, would it be expected to have the same contaminants appear? Would it be possible to test the theory by having different labs look at the vaccines to see if they all see the same "contaminants?"
That's a theory that can be tested, right?
-PJ
I tend to agree. I used to teach microscopy way too many years ago and also did a lot of microscopy with asbestos, and most of that looks like dirty slides.
“Those are contaminants”
Yeh sure. 😆
“He needs to use clean slides, and/or a different method for transferring the fluid from the vials. Those are contaminants, but not from the vials.”
Oh yeah, that’s it. /s
The scientist probably didn’t know that you need clean slides. /s
He should have come here to FR for instruction before using his electron microscope. /s