Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can't Say That? NPR Morning Host Triggered by Utterance of the Word 'Abortionist'
mrcNewsbusters ^ | October 9, 2021 | Tim Graham

Posted on 10/20/2021 9:02:14 PM PDT by Morgana

Something shocking happened on NPR on Friday. NPR Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep interviewed a pro-life activist in Texas, Rebecca Parma of Texas Right to Life. It was less shocking that it was hostile throughout. He tossed questions like "Wasn't your strategy actually to stop abortions in a way that is unconstitutional at the moment?"

And: "There's a supremacy clause in the Constitution. Federal law applies to the state of Texas. Texas lost the civil war. I mean, this is - it's very clearly in contravention of federal law."

But where it obviously broke for the NPR host is when Parma used the word "abortionist," which spurred a lecture about using terms that are not "universally accepted." Break out the laugh track:

INSKEEP: People appear to be in some clinics performing abortions now. Do you have people gathering information for lawsuits?

PARMA: I mean, they're - some of these clinics are being pretty obvious about the fact that they're resuming abortions. And so - you know, when this case is settled, the pro-life movement in Texas is fully planning to hold the abortion industry accountable to the fullest extent possible. And there is that provision, like you said, that retroactively can hold abortionists accountable if they violate the law. And there's a four-year statute of limitation with that. So there's time even as we watch what happens on the legal front and the injunction being dissolved eventually.

INSKEEP: I should just note - I mean, you're using terminology that's not universally accepted. And I feel I need to make a note of it when you say things like 'pre-born' and 'abortionist.' I understand that's your language. But we're talking about doctors performing medical procedures that are legal under federal law, correct?

What makes this laughable is that NPR routinely dabbles in all the pro-abortion terminology that is not "universally accepted."

A week before on All Things Considered, NPR reporter Danielle Kurtzleben promoted nationwide pro-abortion marches with all their preferred lingo employed: "abortion rights," "abortion access," "abortion justice," "abortion protections," and "abortion care." In September, they touted "abortion providers and seekers" in Texas. Neutrality on abortion has never been their method at NPR.

Parma returned fire:

PARMA: Well, just because they're legal doesn't mean they're right, you know? An abortion is - it is a violent procedure that results in the death of one of the patients, and that's the child in the mother's womb. And that's the reality of it. And so that's what we're trying to highlight, too, is this isn't a normal procedure. You don't go for medicine, usually, to end up in death. You go for life. And that's not what happening. And it's unfortunate.

INSKEEP: And we'll just acknowledge that's your view of life. It's not a universal view of life.

What? NPR, the network that "follows the science," insists that abortions don't end up in death?

NPR is brought to you in part by....you. And lots of "abortion opponents." Taxpayer funding supports the national operation in DC, and hundreds of public-radio stations across America. Contact Public Editor Kelly McBride here.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionist; bidenvoters; npr; prolife
ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST ABORTIONIST
1 posted on 10/20/2021 9:02:14 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

DEATH DEALING ABORTIONISTS.


2 posted on 10/20/2021 9:06:11 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

Defund Pravda


3 posted on 10/20/2021 9:11:34 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Whatever we do, we can NOT let them control the language. If they object, repeat it even louder— define it for them if you have to no matter how mad they get. When you debate these people, do not give them an inch, because they will never give one for the unborn.


4 posted on 10/20/2021 9:15:19 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER, BABY KILLER,


5 posted on 10/20/2021 9:25:50 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

In the tears leading up to CW1 people employed all sorts of pretzel logic and language constructs to avoid stating the obvious humanity of slaves.

EXACT same thing going on here with the additional irony that it’s being done that are CONSTANTLY bringing up slavery.


6 posted on 10/20/2021 9:31:38 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Baby murderers.

The baby is alive and the procedure kills it.

It’s not a view it’s a physical fact.


7 posted on 10/20/2021 9:42:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (Resistance is not futile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
Let's go back to 1857 and see how this sounds with a few changes:

INSKEEP: I should just note - I mean, you're using terminology that's not universally accepted. And I feel I need to make a note of it when you say things like 'slave' and 'slave-owner.' I understand that's your language. But we're talking about citizens owning negros which is legal under federal law, correct?

8 posted on 10/20/2021 9:57:20 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What word are we allowed to use? Dereproductivists?


9 posted on 10/20/2021 10:33:48 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
Let's go back to 1857 and see how this sounds with a few changes:

The proper (i.e., most-effective) response on Innkeep's part would have been to shoot back:

"Mr. Morning Host, you, too, are using terminology which is not universally accepted!"

Would have stopped the host dead in his tracks.

Regards,

10 posted on 10/21/2021 12:17:30 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

but Ivermectin is a HORSE DEWORMER!


11 posted on 10/21/2021 8:22:03 AM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Used to be interviews were so audiences could gain perspectives on both sides of a debate — not platforms for moderators to berate their guests….


12 posted on 10/21/2021 8:30:15 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Murder Inc. was illegal in the 1930’s now it isn’t it’s what liberals call progress.

Mafia not amused


13 posted on 10/21/2021 10:05:44 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...BABY KILLER...


14 posted on 10/21/2021 12:42:55 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“unconstitutional at the moment?”?

As if the Constitution has no actual meaning apart from what the Supreme Court pours into it “at the moment”.


15 posted on 11/03/2021 7:15:01 PM PDT by Catholic and Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson