Why experts say monoclonal antibodies aren't vaccine substitute

ABC ^ | 17 October 2021 | Dr. Jess Dawson

[backwoods-engineer]

The ‘vaccine’ (gene therapy) isn’t a “vaccine substitute”, either. Oh, and I won’t take it. No matter what. I’m immune now anyway.

[backwoods-engineer]

Hopefully, we can hold it in Nuremberg, PA, so it will also be called “The Nuremberg Trials.”

[Caipirabob]

By the same headline, can’t it be said that the currently promoted vaccines are not substitutes for a real vaccine, either?

[whinecountry]

Wow. Source? Not challenging you; just curious as I am saving your graphic for later distribution to friends, family, etc.

[grey_whiskers]

You’re just wrong.
“Dead” wrong.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243826

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243813

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243789

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243839

[cuz1961]

The data supporting these antibodies is much more limited than the extensive data supporting currently approved and authorized vaccines..

/\

Uh,

the antibodies data came into being upon the Covid “outbreak”..

The vaccine ( and data) didn’t exist till about 6 months latter..

So the data for vaccines is months less than the antibodies.

( or was the vaccine already in existence months before ?)

Propaganda I say !

But. maybe

our resident misinformation agent

will pop up to let us know what to really beleive soon.

/-)

[tapatio]

"Monoclonal Antibodies are Not meant to be a vaccine, but a therapeutic. "

When my spouse had the monoclonal therapy last month the Dr giving it said he would only need one shot in December as the monoclonal would act as the first.

[chuckles]

Are you saying the Monoclonal Antibodies are some sort of vaccine that act to cure covid within days but the covid vaccine doesn't cure anything but is still needed?

I had full blown covid and was cured in 2 days after the antibodies. If I had the covid vaccine shot, it won't cure covid and may cause harm.

I don't see why you might need a "booster shot" after having covid antibodies that are 13-27 times more numerous than the shot would give.

Taking the shot almost guarantees you will contract covid and having covid previously protects for at least 6 mo. or more.

IMO, I would NOT take a vaccine that is only 30-40% protective VS a very successful therapeutic with fewer side effects. Ivermectin has successfully cured covid and wiped it out in India and a couple other countries yet Americans are denied the most powerful cure yet to date. We have many hundreds of thousands of cured patients right here in America to study the results of therapeutics over the vaccine.

I live in a small town in East Texas and after 18 months of Covid we racked up less than 100 deaths when the big push for mandatory vaccines came up. Within weeks the death rate doubled and everyone I know was sick with Covid and many were dying. Most of those had the first covid shot.

The reason for this involved answer is it sounds like your doctor is Marching to the Biden answer plan. IMO, Your doctor has never heard of Ivermectin or wants to put your spouse on some sort of checklist for Washington. Every doctor in my town of 2500 uses Ivermectin or HCQ right now. Covid is almost gone. The only people getting the Vaccine now are know Democrats that ride around in a car with 2 masks on. It has become almost a Kabuki theater around here about covid treatment.