Posted on 10/16/2021 1:27:42 AM PDT by ransomnote
In a response to a request made under the Transparency Act (2013), the Ministry of Health in Spain acknowledged that “it does not have a SARS-CoV-2 culture” nor a “registry of laboratories with culture and isolation capacity for testing.” The response also discharged all responsibility for diagnoses and treatments onto health professionals and recognised that “tests, by themselves, are not usually sufficient to determine the disease.”
On 30 September, El Diestro reported: “those ‘tests’ which have been used to justify decisions made about confinements, closures, isolations, patient treatments, vaccination and dictatorial measures aimed at ending the freedoms of all, ‘are not usually enough to determine the disease’, according to the Health Ministry.”
In May 2021, we published an article ‘Hundreds of FOI’s reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of COVID-19 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever’. At the time the status of requests to Spanish authorities were as below:
On 15 February 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted a Freedom of Information request regarding isolation or purification of the phantom “virus” to the Basque Country (Spain) Office of the President and Department of Health and all dependent institutions. Months later Kepa wrote: “According to the law, they have 30 days to respond; 60 if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.”
On March 30, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted another FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the flagship of Spanish research, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (Higher Council of Scientific Research). Months later Kepa writes: “Again, they have not responded and, therefore, their silence is refusing access to the information they may hold in regards to my question.”
“The CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.”
Since our previous article, on 22 July 2021, La Asociación Liberum (Liberum Association); Biólogos por la Verdad (Biologists for the Truth); and, an individual made a request to the Spanish Ministry of Health for public information regarding the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The request, amongst other things, asked for a sample culture of the virus that could be independently tested.
Authorities received the request on 10 August and according to the Transparency Act the Ministry of Health had one month to respond. They gave their response, including the above statements, on 8 September 2021 which can be found HERE (Spanish).
We have used Google translate to translate the Ministry of Health’s full response from Spanish into English and attached it below.
The significant portion of the response from the Ministry of Health is on page three of the PDF document above and is quoted below (using Google translate):
“The Ministry of Health does not have a SARS-CoV-2 culture for testing, and it does not have a registry of laboratories with culture and isolation capacity for testing.
In relation to the SARS-COV-2 diagnostic tests, and in general, with issues related to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic, the Ministry of Health works with the aforementioned documents, which are updated according to the epidemiological need, to enable decision-making in relation to the management of the pandemic, and the dissemination of information to third parties that can use it in their specific environments. In this sense, the most conceptual and definitional issues remain more in academic and teaching environments, with the Ministry of Health playing a more secondary role and not acting on these issues in its power.
Finally, the evaluation of patients in relation to their state of health, be it COVID-19 or another disease or pathology, is the responsibility of the reference health professionals. The tests, by themselves, are not usually sufficient to determine disease, requiring an expert evaluation of the person who has been tested. Either way, the case definition can be found at the following link: [ransomnote: video at link]
The Ministry of Health (Spain) Has Acknowledged in Writing That They Have No Covid-19 Virus Isolates or Cultures (2 mins)
~END OF THE EXPOSE article~
ransomnote: The CDC has also acknowledged it has no isolated samples of Covid.
This is a huge issue few ever talk about- they've been driving the country (and the rest of the world) into the ground without ever proving there is an isolated Covid virus they can test.
Hint: They reclassified the flu as Covid, and then withheld ALL treatment from a wide range of people struggling with a variety of respiratory illnesses, including pneumonia.
The CDC glibbly noted that 'we don't have the flu anymore' (Dr. Birx was also quoted saying that) and yet the CDC and Fauci are pushing for a flu vax this year?
And while the flu just disappeared in 2020-2021, the CDC is telling us Covid will never leave? Why can't Covid 'disappear' like the flu?
Since the CDC never isolated the virus, the tests can't identify the Covid virus. The Covid tests are not valid (97% false positive rate), but the Covid 'tests' were used to validate the 'vaccines' which aren't working. Here are some related links which back up what I am saying:
CDC FOIA’s – no isolated samples of Covid virus
CDC NOW Admits NO ‘Gold Standard’ for the Isolation for ANY Virus! [CDC FOIAs, CoV–2 and 19, MERS, Influenza, Polio, Measles, HIV, XMRV, HTLV-1, HTLV-III/LAV, HPV, Ebola, Zika]
drrobertyoung.com ^ | June 12, 2021 | Robert O Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
The CDC Says No Isolated Samples of the Covid-19 Virus Are Available. The Development of Covid-19 Vaccines Based
3/25/2021 | Vanity
CDC - Fake Covid ‘tests’
FDA document admits “covid” PCR test was developed without isolated covid samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else
fos-sa.org ^ | August 2, 2021 | Naomi Wolf
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel [inludes my remarks, images from document, and the download link for the document]
fda.gov ^ | 07/21/2021 | CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases
Dnice4Jesus @DeniceMarin emailed the CDC to ask them how they are verifying what variant is dominant. This was their answer. Thoughts?
Twitter ^ | 7/29/2021 | Dnice4Jesus @DeniceMarin
The COVID-19 Variant Fraud – Why They Won’t Tell You Which Variant You Are Infected With
greatgameindia.com ^ | September 11, 2021 | greatgameindia.com
Whistleblower! Nurse DESTROYS "Delta" Narrative, VACCINATED Patients Fill Hospital (transcript and 15 minute video, important information for you and your family)
redvoicemedia.com ^ | September 8, 2021 | Stew Peters, Nurse Whistleblower
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon
PLAGUE OF FEAR 2020 - Part 7 - THE NAIL IN COVID'S COFFIN
hive.blog ^ | Jan 31, 2020 | Steve Falconer, francesleader
PING
BTTT!!!
Say, Ransomnote. Isn't this exactly what you've been saying since the beginning of this covid psyop? Much to the dismay of the numerous government tools and fearbros on this web site?
I expect they'll come around here shortly to explain to us how this Ministry of Health in Spain is a bunch of quacks and they don't even speak the King's English.
Keep on being right. You're a patriot and a hero.
Future proves past.
Q
In other words, there is no way to know that you have it, unless you became ill from it.
My understand is that:
The virus is chopped up by at least two different enzymes.
The little pieces are reproduced many times over.
The little pieces are separated by type.
The little pieces are then sequenced individually.
The sequences are then fitted together logically.
People go to universities and learn how to do this.
Your point?
The point is the experts know what they are doing.
“All of these efforts have relied on one crucial scientific discovery—sequencing the COVID-19 genome. The genome, which researchers in China made publicly available on Jan. 11, has formed the foundation of scientific efforts to tackle the virus, from testing, to tracking how the virus is mutating, to developing those vaccines.”
“On Jan. 3, Zhang Yongzhen, a virologist at Shanghai’s Fudan University, received a sample pathogen taken from a patient infected by a mysterious virus in Wuhan, China. Over the next two days, Zhang and a team in Shanghai worked day and night to map out a genome.”
“’It took us less than 40 hours [to map the genome], so very, very fast, Zhang told Time in August. In 2003, researchers had spent months sequencing SARS, a virus that spread through China and killed hundreds around the world. Now, Zhang could deploy new, next-generation sequencing tools to map the genome in just a matter of days.”
“Within a few days of the sequence being published, many laboratories (including the lab here at Hong Kong University) were able to make diagnostic PCR kits for the new virus and start testing people.”
“American vaccine maker Moderna, which recently received approval to distribute its vaccine in the U.S., says that it used the genome to develop a COVID-19 vaccine by Jan. 13, just two days after the genome was uploaded.”
“Researchers sequenced coronavirus samples at the microbiology laboratory of the University Hospital of Badajoz in Spain on April 15.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/delta-coronavirus-variant-strongest-threat-vaccinated-people-2021-6
“Ortho’s new qualitative VITROS® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total N antibody test is designed to capture the nucleocapsid protein, detect total antibodies to the COVID-19 virus, and is intended for use as an aid in identifying individuals with an adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2. The test offers 99.2% specificity and excellent sensitivity. Ortho is the first company to have an EUA for both a quantitative IgG antibody assay targeting the spike protein and a total assay targeting the nucleocapsid protein.”
Every once in a while the truth slips out of some random source.
Thank God.
Yer killin' me, Griffin.
On second thought, you're right. Just not in the way you think you are.
The so-called experts gave us this man-made 'virus', the so-called 'guidance' (lockdowns, masks, etc) that is ravaging the world, and a poison vaccine that doesn't work.
They do know what they are doing, alright. Now figure out what that is, and you're onto something.
I guess that would depend on which experts one is talking about and what exactly qualifies someone as an expert
Of the few true experts I've met in various fields, none would claim to be one, while the people that would bestow that title on others usually had little to no knowledge of the subject.
So somone cobbles together a virus from little pieces i in a ”logical” sequence, and presumes they have it correct.
And they have to go to college to learn to guess good, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.