Posted on 10/15/2021 10:43:43 PM PDT by ransomnote
There have been plenty of illustrations now about the deception of 90% to 99% Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE).
There is also now plenty enough real-world, empirical data to assess the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine overall as a public health tool.
By Joel Smalley – Quantitative Data Analyst
In respect of COVID-19 cases, it is clear that there have been substantially more this year, post-vax, than there were last year.
At least it looks like cases are no longer rising like they did last year into the “season”.
Is this because of the vaccine?
Well, most of the cases are in the vaccinated. Of course, most of the population is vaccinated.
So, are there really more cases in the unvaccinated?
No.
The rate of cases in the fully vaccinated is directly proportional to the vaccinated population.
OK, but with 90% to 99% effectiveness in reducing severe illness, we should see substantially less vaccinated in hospital than unvaccinated, relative to cases, right?
Well, the shapes of the curve don’t look like the vaccinated are doing any better.
But what about the Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness?
There’s about a 13% to 19% absolute difference in vaccinated proportion of COVID-19 hospitalisations and vaccinated population, so, yes, perhaps there is evidence of reduced severity.
[Never mind there are substantially more hospitalisations than last year.]
More importantly, can we see the same vaccine effectiveness in deaths?
Nope. No obvious difference in the slopes of the curves except the unvaccinated appears less severe.
And relative to the vaccinated population?
Nope. Exactly the same, just like cases. No evidence whatsoever that there are relatively fewer vaccinated COVID-19 deaths than the vaccinated population.
Again, fortunately deaths appear to be declining compared to last year when they were rising. Great news!
Can we attribute this to the vaccine? No, because the vaccinated are not doing any better than the unvaccinated. Maybe (just maybe), it’s background natural immunity? And in terms of overall public health, have “we” put a lid on excess deaths?
Alas not.
The current situation is significantly worse than last year or many previous years in fact for the time of year.
And it’s not COVID-19.
And in other news...the edge of the earth has finally been discovered proving the earth is flat!
They are not supposed to work.
There is no question in my mind, the truly fake (and necessarily redefined) “vax jabs” are part of a larger obedience/control, and deadly totalitarian conspiracy.
Will know more details after many more are dead, and government has left no question as to our new subjugated/slave roles.
Once again it’s proven the vaxx doesn’t work or... it works just as designed to slowly depopulate the world.
This was never about the health and welfare of anyone. It was always about control and dividing people all over the world in the most heinous way.
True justice would demand heads roll over this farce. This is why “they” censored opposition and actual cures to this virus.
The vax and masks do not help. Ivermectin, zinc and aspirin do.
Right on! 🕶👍
The vaccine has been a great disappointment. I hoped it would cause severe mutations in my body that would make me a force to be reckoned with. I wanted to be one who would be obeyed. My skin would be a ruby red. I would grow a tail and don horns upon my head. None of that happened. Maybe a booster will set all those balls in motion.
Why are you on a pro-life site? DU would suit you better
The Delta Variant is more contagious. Because of that there are more cases.
The Delta variant doesn't exist. If it did, it would be similar enough to Covid for our immune systems to deal with it.
Dr. Yeadon talked about research done that proved those who had SARS1 in 2003 and recovered had maintained their immunity to it 17 years later, when they were tested with it in 2021.
Then they tested those 2003 Sars1 patients with SARS2 Covid. They were immune to Covid. Why? because SARS1 and SARS2 were estimated to have 22% difference in genome. Our immune systems don't need to rebuilt immunity to every variation of a virus. The CDC has been lying to us.
The variants would be 1-2% different and recognized by immune systems. Many already were immune to Covid because they had been exposed to similar Coronaviruses. The CDC built a house of lies around this.
There's a whistleblower nurse who talks about 'DELTA' never being written in any medical document in her hospital, and that there is no test for Delta. The only time anyone at the hospital mentioned DELTA was in a letter to hospital employees, pressuring them to get the 'vax'. That nurse said 'DELTA' didn't exist, and that the 'surge' was actually all those harmed by the vaccine.
Ransomnote, none of these graphs take into account that older people in the UK were vaccinated first. They account for a larger portion of the vaccinated group. This negatively impacts the hospitalization and death rates for vaccinated.
So, then what do the vaxx actually do, instead?
So far, they seem to be a false hope, politically mandated money machines and instruments of control for all and damage or death for a few.
Damn good thing the vaxx pusher politicians first gave the manufacturers and themselves a level of immunity that their vaxx never could.
They’ll need it, probably sooner than later, but I don’t think it will protect them against the FUup variant that’s likely coming for them.
These power made mad Karens in control have a knack for pissing people off and once they’ve finally riled up the quiet types in our polite society, like they’re doing now, they’re done.
“The issue is not the issue. The revolution is the issue.”
Covid and the vaxxes are a puppet-show for the amusement of the masses.
The real action is behind the scenes.
The tyrants have taken another step forward in their very simple plan—a boot on our faces—forever.
Covid and the vaxxes are obedience training for the human cattle. The elites see us as their farm animals.
With all of that ignorance about the Delta variant, what is the truth? I wouldn’t trust Dr. Robert Yeadon’s credibility. Yeaden’s “claims are false, dangerous and deeply irresponsible,” said a spokesman for Britain’s Department of Health & Social Care, when asked about Yeadon’s views. “COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to protect people from coronavirus and will save thousands of lives.”
Yeadon’s credibiliy is based on the fact that he worked at Pfizer, says Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, an organization that combats online misinformation. “Yeadon’s background gives his dangerous and harmful messages false credibility.” One of his ex-colleagues, Sterghios A. Moschos, who holds degrees in molecular biology and pharmaceutics, told Yeadon, “Mike what hell ?! Are you out to actively kill people? You do realize that if you are wrong, your suggestions will result in deaths ??” “There was a tone in his voice that was nothing like I ever remembered of Mike,” Moschos said. “It was very angry, very bitter.” Mark Treherne, chairman of Talisman Therapeutics in Cambridge, England, said he overlapped with Yeadon at Pfizer for about two years and sometimes had coffee with him. “He always seemed knowledgeable, intelligible, a good scientist. We were both trained as pharmacologists … so we had something in common.”
“I obviously disagree with Mike and his recent views,” he said. “This does not sound like the guy I knew 20 years ago.” A group of Yeadon’s former Pfizer colleagues expressed their concern in a private letter to him:
“We have become acutely aware of your views on COVID-19 over the last few months … the single mindedness, lack of scientific rigour and one sided interpretation of often poor quality data is far removed from the Mike Yeadon we so respected and enjoyed working with.” Noting his “vast following on social media” and that his claim about infertility “has spread globally,” the group wrote, “We are very worried that you are putting people’s health at risk.”
On a social media account, with Yeaden’s name and profile picture he shared the unscientific ideas that vaccination is dangerous because it causes magnetism, citing a “study” done by a business student in Luxembourg who walked up to random people on the street and tried to stick magnets to them. Science has value as a knowledge-producing institution because lots of people check your work.
During an interview on Steve Bannon’s podcast War Room, Yeadon said that he planned to be spending a lot on supporting “U.S. politicians and influencers” over the next months. He also has established (or at least endorsed) an initiative in the U.K., “Liberal Spring,” to remake the Lib Dems party into a sort of anti-vaccine-passport party.
Yeaden has bought a parcel of land in Tanzania, which he plans to remake it into a sort of intentional community called “Liberty Places” for vax-less mask-less people. OMG! Jim Jones here we come!
jonrick46 wrote: With all of that ignorance about the Delta variant, what is the truth? ransomnote: did you see the response to the woman who wrote to inquire what variant she had? Have you heard anyone, anywyere claim they test patients for variants and tell them what they have? No. jonrick46 wrote: I wouldn’t trust Dr. Robert Yeadon’s credibility. No, you wouldn't. Because Yeadon has decades of relevant training and profesional experience which he is throwing away by speaking against the party line because he doesn't believe people with a sense of decency can remain silent. jonrick46 wrote: Yeaden’s “claims are false, dangerous and deeply irresponsible,” said a spokesman for Britain’s Department of Health & Social Care, when asked about Yeadon’s views. “COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to protect people from coronavirus and will save thousands of lives.” ransomnote: Have you heard what the left says about the 2020 election? What they say about President Trump? Have you heard any l lies from Biden? jonrick46 wrote: Yeadon’s credibiliy is based on the fact that he worked at Pfizer, says Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, an organization that combats online misinformation. ransomnote: Are you so indoctrinated that you believe in such things as an altruistic 'CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE"? Are you GONE already? They don't admit who funds them. They have censorship talking points and deem anything they don't like as 'hate speech'. What are you doing on a conservative site if that's what your values are? jonrick46 wrote: “Yeadon’s background gives his dangerous and harmful messages false credibility.” ransomnote: Biden has been saying that about conservatives, too. That's what you support? "Dangerous" and harmful messages if you don't agree with them? Shall I claim you are 'dangerous' for posting your thoughts if I disagree? That's cancel culture. DU is that way----|> jonrick46 wrote: One of his ex-colleagues, Sterghios A. Moschos, who holds degrees in molecular biology and pharmaceutics, told Yeadon, “Mike what hell ?! Are you out to actively kill people? You do realize that if you are wrong, your suggestions will result in deaths ??” “There was a tone in his voice that was nothing like I ever remembered of Mike,” Moschos said. “It was very angry, very bitter.” Mark Treherne, chairman of Talisman Therapeutics in Cambridge, England, said he overlapped with Yeadon at Pfizer for about two years and sometimes had coffee with him. “He always seemed knowledgeable, intelligible, a good scientist. We were both trained as pharmacologists … so we had something in common.”
ransomnote: Wow you totally are onboard with cancel culture. Someone disagreed with him and lied to make a point and there you are, onboard. Covid is 99.9% survivable for most people and DrS Zelenko, McCullough, Merrit, Corey etc. have all come up with excellent treatment protocols. What's killing people is denial of prompt treatment, withhouding effective drugs, deploying harmful meds (Remdesivir and sedation etc.) So Yeadon advocates for the best treatment in his opinion and someone disagrees? Researchers used to be permitted to have separate opinions about the best course of treatment without simply branding someone else's idea reckless endangement. When did you go over to the left? jonrick46 wrote: “I obviously disagree with Mike and his recent views,” he said. “This does not sound like the guy I knew 20 years ago.” A group of Yeadon’s former Pfizer colleagues expressed their concern in a private letter to him: “We have become acutely aware of your views on COVID-19 over the last few months … the single mindedness, lack of scientific rigour and one sided interpretation of often poor quality data is far removed from the Mike Yeadon we so respected and enjoyed working with.” Noting his “vast following on social media” and that his claim about infertility “has spread globally,” the group wrote, “We are very worried that you are putting people’s health at risk.” ransomnote: Pathetic. Is there anything Biden or Fauci lies about that you won't treat as gospel and use to defame others? President Trump has countless lawsuits against him at any given time and it's not because he did anything wrong. Resistance from creeps, sellouts and liars is a badge of honor and no reflection on yeadon. jonrick46 wrote: On a social media account, with Yeaden’s name and profile picture he shared the unscientific ideas that vaccination is dangerous because it causes magnetism, citing a “study” done by a business student in Luxembourg who walked up to random people on the street and tried to stick magnets to them. Science has value as a knowledge-producing institution because lots of people check your work. ransomnote: I have no idea if he even said what he did - it doesn't match any other statements he made. He has been specific as to why he believes vaccination is dangerous and among his key talking points, he never mentioned 'magnetism'. He has many, excellent reasons to be against the vaccines and has written of them extensively. I guess they need to detract from his well reasoned objections and went for 'magnetism' like that's his key concern! Why do you carry water for thos running the plandemic? jonrick46 wrote: During an interview on Steve Bannon’s podcast War Room, Yeadon said that he planned to be spending a lot on supporting “U.S. politicians and influencers” over the next months. He also has established (or at least endorsed) an initiative in the U.K., “Liberal Spring,” to remake the Lib Dems party into a sort of anti-vaccine-passport party. ransomnote: How awful. He believes in something and is willing to invest his lifes' energies in protecting public health! jonrick46 wrote: Yeaden has bought a parcel of land in Tanzania, which he plans to remake it into a sort of intentional community called “Liberty Places” for vax-less mask-less people. OMG! Jim Jones here we come! ransomnote: You're auditioning for lefty smear machine on FR? Why not go to Du to get that job? How dare that man want to escape the totalitarianism you vigorously support. HUNT HIM DOWN AND VAX him! That will punish him for independent thought! The rest of us are greatful to Yeadon for taking the hatred that people like you dish out and that he does it selflessly, to protect humanity. |
You answer with fanciful misconception and diversion. So Yeadon was right to believe vaccinated people become magnetic? He was right to say vaccinated women have a loss of fertility and can have miscarriages? Is Yeadon correct that the epidemic is over and no need to get vaccinated? Of course, because you will not accept the fact that Yeadon has become a nut job.
Now run along and bark at someone else who wants to tell the truth!
Right? They promised me 5G if I got the shot.
Where's my 5G!!!
The “vaxx” has, after all, proven to be a flu shot that targets certain strains. Except it’s also experimental therapy with unknown long-term effects.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.