Posted on 10/12/2021 10:43:20 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
On the heels of learning that the Food and Drug Administration purchased aborted babies’ body parts and requested “fresh and never frozen,” comes another story that sounds as if it’s from a horror movie or one of human history’s darkest chapters:
Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh have been conducting what have been called “Nazi-level experiments,” one of which involved grafting babies’ scalps onto lab rats.
[…]
Yet the university might have transgressed against legality along with morality. That is to say, Fox News reported late last month that the congressmen’s “letter expressed concern that tissue may have been obtained through illegal abortion procedures.”
“‘We are alarmed by public records obtained by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which show that the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) may have violated federal law by altering abortion procedures to harvest organs from babies who were old enough to live outside the womb,’” Fox quoted the legislators as writing.
After outlining an even more damning charge — what she calls the allegation that “aborted babies … were alive while their kidneys, livers, or hearts were cut out of their body” — Allen states that “Pitt’s own words should spark a full investigation, yet despite this evidence, those in the positions to act have thus far been silent.”
“Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen Zappala has done nothing,” the writer explains. “U.S. Attorney Stephen Kaufman declined to comment. Attorney General Josh Shapiro, an extremely pro-abortion politician with Planned Parenthood among his campaign donors, has given no response, except to tweet out his support for abortion-on-demand…”
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
That’s because libtards enjoy experimenting on people and animals.
Ask Dr Fubar
Murder most foul.
It should be mandatory that all college students and high school students to read the following items:
1. the transcripts of the Nuremberg war crimes trials; it consists of 15 volumes; the first volume is called “The doctor trials”; it is so graphic it is difficult to read.
2. “Medical science under dictatorship” by Leo Alexander in the July 14 1949 issue of the NEJM
and
4. “Nazi oaks” by Mark Musser; in this work he examines the Nazi roots of the environmental movement and he graphically shows just how ungodly and antihuman the modern environmental really is.
Any decent college library should have them except for the Mark Musser book; you may have to go online to find it
The comment said it only lived for some weeks. It had a flat looking humanoid face and the body of a piglet, and if it wasn't some sort of movie prop or fake, it was a horrible Frankensteinien experiment.
Since there is obviously a conspiracy of permissiveness regarding these procedures - in the face of a glaring lack of whistleblowers - it is clear that a private organization may need to offer a ‘reward’ for evidence of such procedures.
I would support such a move.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.