Look at Singapore:
Posted on 10/10/2021 6:17:48 AM PDT by Libloather
Look at what evidence? There’s evidence that supports anything you want to believe about the vaccine. Absolutely anything.
2021 is the year that “follow the science” became “follow the magic”.
They would do better to pitch magic spells, crystal balls, and travel to alternate universes.
Honesty is the best policy!
Three lies for the price of one, innit?
I don’t think this is a Christian thing, I think this is a libertarian thing. By characterizing this as a Christian thing this constitutes yet another attempt by the Left to defame Christianity and Christians.
According to The Associated Press, those cells used today are clones and not the original ones taken from fetal tissue.
—
Well of course they’re clones. They’re clones of aborted fetuses. Good old AP “fact checking”.
Number of deaths has gone up since the “vaccines” were introduced.
It’s the evidence that is so damning!
Last line: Fetal cell lines are also not present in the vaccines.
I am unaware of ANYONE who claims that the cells of murdered, pre-born babies are 'PRESENT' in the vaxxes. All approved vaccines use such cells for TESTING! THAT is but ONE REASON why MANY OF US DON'T WANT THE VACCINES that are CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
I am not an 'anti-vaxxer', I am for FREEDOM OF CHOICE. If there were a vaccine shown to be effective, NOT developed using MURDERED PRE-BORN BABIES for testing, AND did not have so many DANGEROUS side effects, I would consider such a vaccine. Such a vaccine is not currently available.
I’m sorry, but I will not knowingly use a “vaccine” that uses fetal cells or fetal cell lines in the development, manufacturing, or testing. And, so far, all of the current approved vaxxes use these cells somewhere in the process.
That even until this day, with massive evidence, the NIH still fails to acknowledge natural immunity as an alternative to the vaccine tells me the agency is scientifically compromised and very likely captured by Big Pharma. Everything they then say compromised. They’ve sold themselves out.
In addition, I've been following VI Warshaski's First Rule of Detecting: "follow the money." I don't like the patterns I see.
Finally, there is the evidence of the exceptions to the proposed mandates. What's good for the goose should be good for the gander. I'm not seeing the CDC and NIH following their own rules. More "rules for thee and not for me" in the baking of the mandates.
No.
This jab is not designed to save lives.
It is designed to kill.
And they know that.
The samee clowns who WON’T look at the ‘evidence’ demonstrating the Dominion vote fraud??
Seriously!
Percentage-wise, the largest group of anti-vaxxers are African-American. So, the Democrats and moderate Republicans are going to implement Jim CrOwVID.
“look at the evidence”
/\
We did.
While the .gov and bureaucrats
threatened to yank medical licenses
if a doc issued a prescription
for what the media called
lethal horse paste ivermectin
and the NIH itself
approved ivermectin last july,
a third of a year ago,
and Congress itself was using it
We are supposed to trust
media, .
gov medical bureaucracies ,
and Congress given “ information “ ?
If I didn’t know better
I’d think our nose is being
deliberately being rubbed in bullsh!t
and they are deliberately
trying to provoke
a violent response
.
_____________
Every thought in this statement is a lie. Lie is a little strong, but certainly every statement is not 100% factually correct either. It is clear their intent is to deceive an unwilling public into an action the public perceives as against it's own interest. So, their intent is despicable.
As Da Coyote rightly points out they have been changing their story minute by minute and they are simply no longer credible. In many cases they are criminally culpable (Fauci et.al.) and rank partisans at best.
Look at Singapore:
I think looking it at the “science” is what is the problem from their perspective.
I don’t think they are looking at the science.
and they are deliberately
trying to provoke
a violent response
/\
And since we haven’t fallen for that bannana up our tailpipe
They are now conflating
1st amendment protest right of redress
with
violence.
They can’t get real violence
So they’ll redefine speech they don’t like as violence.
I saw that witch before Congress
“Threats of violence, intimidation and harassment”
As if those three seperate issues were one .
She refused to separate them.
They are attempting to criminalize
free speach
and resistance to Communist ideology
and the Communist overthrow of our nation
through our Schools and children.
.spit
It may be that this administration is acting as though deplorables (white evangelicals, you know, clutching our Bibles and guns) are the problem, to use as a dog whistle to convince vaccine hesitant demographic groups to get their vaccines. “You don’t want to be like THOSE stupid superstitious white people do you? No, you are smarter than that, and you can prove it by getting your vaccination.”
Its not the vaccinations fault that Democrats are back to their old tricks with the dog whistles! Oh but thats right… its for a “noble” cause.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.