“Colorado hospital denies kidney transplant to woman who refused COVID-19 vaccine”
This situation is actually quite different. These physicians are being persecuted for attempting to uphold what has been accepted science for 100 years. For instance, natural immunity is being ignored in favor of questionable "vaccinations" even though natural immunity is accepted science.
How long before one of our resident freeper “docs” comes along to tell us how all the above is nonsense? Even though the above accurately describes how medicine should be and notes the policy makers refusal to allow doctors to do their job correctly.
And let this be our patients petition to the doctors of this country:
We ask you doctors of America to get a backbone and to prescribe the drugs you think their patients need, even if they are forbidden by your bosses. And if the pharmacists won’t fill the prescriptions, you doctors it’s your obligation to get the medicines yourself and give them to the patients.
We know you have massive student loans to pay back. We know you went into medicine hoping to get the perks of a nice house and a nice car and a nice country club membership. But you also swore and affirmed the Hippocratic Oath, it is your duty to help patients first. So yes, we are asking you to risk losing it all, and to do what is right.
Imagine a world where doctors practice medicine not politicians.
Nullification of the Nuremberg Codes.
I hate to say it but we’re at the tipping point. These codes were enacted in 1947 after the acts of Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele and his ilk. Now we, the American citizen, are the test subjects just as the Nazis of WWII Germany. Under these rules, anyone who violates them is considered a genocidal war criminal. This includes those that give material support.
The ten points of the Nuremberg Code for human experimentation are as follows:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the effects upon his health or person, which may come from his participation in the experiment.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made, and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
No one in our government at any level is opposed to the abuse of its citizens. It’s quite clear there are physical reactions to the vaccine including death. The percentage may be small, but we don’t know the long term effects to those who have taken it since there is no clinical trial and the FDA has not approved it yet.
Anyone who speaks out against the vaccine on social is shut down as will I. We are living in a fascist society now supported by proxy by the Government.
Ping