Posted on 10/07/2021 5:29:07 PM PDT by OKSooner
WASHINGTON, D.C. – As of 7 p.m. ET on Monday, September 27, 2021, more than 5,200 doctors and scientists have signed the “The Physicians Declaration,” condemning policymakers for authoritarian approaches of forcing a “one-size-fits-all” COVID treatment strategy which is resulting in “needless illness and death.”
An international alliance of physicians and medical scientists met in Rome, Italy on September 12 - 14 for a three-day Global COVID Summit to speak “truth to power about COVID pandemic research and treatment.” The summit presented an opportunity for the medical professionals to compare studies and assess the efficacy of the various treatments for the Coronavirus that have been developed in hospitals, doctors’ offices and research labs throughout the world.
However, many of these medical professionals have experienced career threats, character assassination, censorship of research papers, clinical trials and patient observations, their professional history and accomplishments altered or omitted in academic and mainstream media because of them providing life-saving treatments for COVID patients.
Dr. Robert Malone, who discovered in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and invented mRNA vaccines while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988, read the Declaration at the summit.
“The Physicians Declaration” states:
“We the physicians of the world, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the profession of medicine as we know it is at a crossroad, are compelled to declare the following;
WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of medicine;
WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients;
WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;
WHEREAS, physicians and other health care providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify new, potentially life saving treatments;
WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients;
WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;
WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:
RESOLVED, that the physician-patient relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship, which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses, to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the patient is an active participant in their care.
RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end. Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.
RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each option, must be restored to receive those treatments.
RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of medicine.
RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers, reputations and livelihoods.
RESOLVED, that we invite patients, who believe in the importance of the physician-patient relationship and the ability to be active participants in their care, to demand access to science-based medical care.”
Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “These medical professionals have been censored and threatened for simply upholding the Hippocratic Oath to ‘do no harm.’ Throughout history, many breakthrough discoveries that have now become accepted science were initially censored. It’s past time to end medical censorship and allow doctors and scientific experts the freedom they rightfully deserve.”
“Colorado hospital denies kidney transplant to woman who refused COVID-19 vaccine”
This situation is actually quite different. These physicians are being persecuted for attempting to uphold what has been accepted science for 100 years. For instance, natural immunity is being ignored in favor of questionable "vaccinations" even though natural immunity is accepted science.
How long before one of our resident freeper “docs” comes along to tell us how all the above is nonsense? Even though the above accurately describes how medicine should be and notes the policy makers refusal to allow doctors to do their job correctly.
And let this be our patients petition to the doctors of this country:
We ask you doctors of America to get a backbone and to prescribe the drugs you think their patients need, even if they are forbidden by your bosses. And if the pharmacists won’t fill the prescriptions, you doctors it’s your obligation to get the medicines yourself and give them to the patients.
We know you have massive student loans to pay back. We know you went into medicine hoping to get the perks of a nice house and a nice car and a nice country club membership. But you also swore and affirmed the Hippocratic Oath, it is your duty to help patients first. So yes, we are asking you to risk losing it all, and to do what is right.
We ask you doctors of America to get a backbone and to prescribe the drugs you think their patients need, even if they are forbidden by your bosses. And if the pharmacists won’t fill the prescriptions, you doctors it’s your obligation to get the medicines yourself and give them to the patients.
We know you have massive student loans to pay back. We know you went into medicine hoping to get the perks of a nice house and a nice car and a nice country club membership. But you also swore and affirmed the Hippocratic Oath, it is your duty to help patients first. So yes, we are asking you to risk losing it all, and to do what is right.
Nicely put. Don't hold your breath.
Imagine a world where doctors practice medicine not politicians.
Nullification of the Nuremberg Codes.
I hate to say it but we’re at the tipping point. These codes were enacted in 1947 after the acts of Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele and his ilk. Now we, the American citizen, are the test subjects just as the Nazis of WWII Germany. Under these rules, anyone who violates them is considered a genocidal war criminal. This includes those that give material support.
The ten points of the Nuremberg Code for human experimentation are as follows:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the effects upon his health or person, which may come from his participation in the experiment.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made, and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
No one in our government at any level is opposed to the abuse of its citizens. It’s quite clear there are physical reactions to the vaccine including death. The percentage may be small, but we don’t know the long term effects to those who have taken it since there is no clinical trial and the FDA has not approved it yet.
Anyone who speaks out against the vaccine on social is shut down as will I. We are living in a fascist society now supported by proxy by the Government.
Since we now know that the vaccines do not prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization or death and may likely be creating the variants and that some areas with higher vaccination rates are, in fact, showing higher case rates, what is the real purpose of this?
The leftist governments are using totalitarian tactics of home imprisonment, social isolation, loss of employment and education, physical violence, shunning and shaming, denial of basic human rights and, in this case, denial of life saving medical treatment to achieve their goal.
This isn't about a virus with a survivability rate greater than the seasonal flu.
It's about something far more sinister.
The Branch Covidians will be here in 3-2-1 …
I am honestly surprised it has taken this long.
Their bots must be asleep.
Yea that or shift change.
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.