[ransomnote]

RitaOK wrote:

Your idiotic remark is precisely incorrect, in whole and in part. Not one syllable of your odd blabbery is true and those who can follow a discussion path know it.

However, your Inspector Clouseau role of rattling through older posts for evidence was hilarious. A little embarrassing for me was to see one of my more ridiculously verbose ones.

You’re always good for a laugh, though.

I don't see why you'd be posting to LS Aggie on the Q thread the same abusve remarks trolls post to me in the forum (e.g., "idiotic remark" "not one syllable of your odd blabbery is true..."). At the link, you quote Juan O Savin's 80%, just as LS Aggie said.

Do you feel you've 'outgrown' the Q thread? Time to move to the forum, perhaps?

[rodguy911]

You are a great leader and we appreciate what you do RN!

Here's another photo of RN:

[Snowybear]

Ah yes, if you don’t agree with my view go away. Right?

I’m just here for the cat gifs doncha know.

-SB

[RitaOK]

Good Grief. You too?

Someone must have entered an alternative universe.

WTH are you gals still pecking about?

On Thread, no Less.

Lj got-it just fine.
She didn’t like it, but she got-it, and she ripped Juan.
No problem.

But, she didn’t hike a dress over her head to rifle upside down through old trunks, trying to find evidence that I had posted 107 stuff before, regarding percentages.

Of Course I Did.
If I didn’t, just let me know. I’ll check your trunks.

I don’t hide much, If you recall. Happy to source what I post.

I have always attributed 107 with the 80%. “80-85%” was the hope. He said That ages ago.

Clouseau may not have had the wherewithal to recognize that 107 *IS* JUAN O’SAVIN.

I heard words like, “disingenuous”, as if I had not attributed Juan O’ Savin with the 80%.

CLOUSEAU did say something “Idiotic”:

CLOUSEAU said something like,
I was “hiding”, or “hiding it”— from saying that I follow Juan O’Savin. That!— was After she already said I was being “disingenuous”.

(Stupidist PC word, ever, when we all know, LIAR, is the preferred word.

Heck, that’s why I posted yesterday or whenever, that he is now reporting, “We’re now around 71%...”.

CheshireCat had a discussion on the meat and bones of his remark. No problem.

Then came CLOUSEAU.. using the “fighting words”. I answered with a little humor.

So?

That’s “ABUSE”?

LOL!

A mountain out of a molehill is you using the word, “ABUSE”.

What is going on, here? That’s absurd. And would I “maybe” like to go away to the Forum. Cute.

The ultimate insult.