Good Grief. You too?
Someone must have entered an alternative universe.
WTH are you gals still pecking about?
On Thread, no Less.
Lj got-it just fine.
She didn’t like it, but she got-it, and she ripped Juan.
No problem.
But, she didn’t hike a dress over her head to rifle upside down through old trunks, trying to find evidence that I had posted 107 stuff before, regarding percentages.
Of Course I Did.
If I didn’t, just let me know. I’ll check your trunks.
I don’t hide much, If you recall. Happy to source what I post.
I have always attributed 107 with the 80%. “80-85%” was the hope. He said That ages ago.
Clouseau may not have had the wherewithal to recognize that 107 *IS* JUAN O’SAVIN.
I heard words like, “disingenuous”, as if I had not attributed Juan O’ Savin with the 80%.
CLOUSEAU did say something “Idiotic”:
CLOUSEAU said something like,
I was “hiding”, or “hiding it”— from saying that I follow Juan O’Savin. That!— was After she already said I was being “disingenuous”.
(Stupidist PC word, ever, when we all know, LIAR, is the preferred word.
Heck, that’s why I posted yesterday or whenever, that he is now reporting, “We’re now around 71%...”.
CheshireCat had a discussion on the meat and bones of his remark. No problem.
Then came CLOUSEAU.. using the “fighting words”. I answered with a little humor.
So?
That’s “ABUSE”?
LOL!
A mountain out of a molehill is you using the word, “ABUSE”.
What is going on, here? That’s absurd. And would I “maybe” like to go away to the Forum. Cute.
The ultimate insult.
| n the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/07/21 Vol.374, Q Day 1441, RitaOK wrote: |
Good Grief. You too? Someone must have entered an alternative universe. WTH are you gals still pecking about? On Thread, no Less. Lj got-it just fine. But, she didn’t hike a dress over her head to rifle upside down through old trunks, trying to find evidence that I had posted 107 stuff before, regarding percentages. Of Course I Did. I don’t hide much, If you recall. Happy to source what I post. I have always attributed 107 with the 80%. “80-85%” was the hope. He said That ages ago. Clouseau may not have had the wherewithal to recognize that 107 *IS* JUAN O’SAVIN. I heard words like, “disingenuous”, as if I had not attributed Juan O’ Savin with the 80%. CLOUSEAU did say something “Idiotic”: CLOUSEAU said something like, (Stupidist PC word, ever, when we all know, LIAR, is the preferred word. Heck, that’s why I posted yesterday or whenever, that he is now reporting, “We’re now around 71%...”. CheshireCat had a discussion on the meat and bones of his remark. No problem. Then came CLOUSEAU.. using the “fighting words”. I answered with a little humor. So? That’s “ABUSE”? LOL! A mountain out of a molehill is you using the word, “ABUSE”. What is going on, here? That’s absurd. And would I “maybe” like to go away to the Forum. Cute. The ultimate insult. |
None of that WWG1WGA civility for you Rita?
I appreciate LSAggie's restraint in the face of obvious provocation. I appreciate any FReeQs and FReepers who still value the constructive environment so many others build here.
The kind of pointless, abusive remarks you made to LSAggie are the norm on the forum.
If civility are accountability are 'LOL' 'a molehill' and 'absurd' to you, perhaps you will at some point find the forum more to your liking.
Rather than disrupting what we have built on the Q thread, or displacing it with the forum's flame-style interaction, perhaps you will find at some point the forum already has more of the the kind of interaction and people you can respect.