SheepWhisperer wrote:
“If I understand correctly, the intent to force full disclosure in order to be able to have fully informed consent.
The catch is that most of the questions cannot or will not be answered, therefore there cannot be fully informed consent, therefore violations abound and a legal trap is set upon termination.
Smart lawyer”
So, given the penchant for corporate drones to ignore letters like this, I guess the only proof one can have, of them not responding, is to send it certified mail, return receipt requested, and ask for a response by a certain date.
That way, there’s proof it was sent.
And if no reply, document that no response was received.
OT........ does anybody know what would be the least invasive, easiest safest way to get tested for the Vid and get results fairly soon?....tia...
My work habit is to cc myself on everything. I don’t do bcc, because I believe it is underhanded. By cc’ing myself this also keeps the most current dialog (and archiving previous correspondence in the communication), in my inbox and keeping it current as an unresolved task. But this is just my work habit.
(Current work site not to be disclosed on this forum)
By sending a to/through to the main supervisor, through chain of command) with a a cc to myself it is defecto proof that if I got the email, all recipients also received it. It’s as good as a read receipt. In these matters I also openly cc my personal email.
But, then again, this is fedgov, like military chain of command communication and protocol and quite unique due to the nature of our organization. Unfortunately, the civilian world often doesn’t adhere to this openness in communication.
Like I mentioned...”unfortunately”