| smileyface wrote: |
You couldn’t just scroll on by O MQD...hehe. Yes, I have concerns about JOS, but he claims Jesus as his Lord and Savior, and repeatedly asks for prayer to God the Almightly. Yes, those in the cabal pray to god, but not the one most people think. I have concerns about JessieC, ClifHigh, Austin-Fitts, Sarah Westall, Linda Paris, Sean at SGT, Michael Jaco, Robin Bullock, Amanda Grace, Gina Philips, and many others, and yet I listen and try to discern from their words and apparent/supposed deeds. I even have concerns about posters on this thread. Pray for discernment. |
*
"Yes, I have concerns about JOS, but he claims Jesus as his Lord and Savior, and repeatedly asks for prayer to God the Almightly."
George W. Bush did that, and he's evil through and through. JOS is attaching fakes to Q and when the fakes are exposed, having convinced people they are the sam people as Q, all are discredited. In the war between Good and Evil, JOS is serving evil.
"I have concerns about JessieC, ClifHigh, Austin-Fitts, Sarah Westall, Linda Paris, Sean at SGT, Michael Jaco, Robin Bullock, Amanda Grace, Gina Philips, and many others, and yet I listen and try to discern from their words and apparent/supposed deeds."
I wasn't aware that you have concerns about JOS and the others you list because you tend cite them with tacit approval, as if we should consider their remarks authoratative insider updates.
You said something about JessieC once, that you were afraid she would identify Trump as being in a cabal (light or dark?) and you were relieved that she said he wasn't (i.e., took her word as authoratative about our Commander in Chief). It seemed that you would change your opinion, and perhaps others should as well, about President Trump, based on what she said as a Satanic 'insider'.
I do opposition research but I rarely post the content on-thread and if I do, I make it plain that I'm posting false content looking for useful scraps. With JOS and JessieC, I see them cited as expert or insider opinion to refute other sources or provide thread direction. This is a problem.
I had checked out JessieC and the past and quickly got in over my head with the complex account of Satanism, more detailed and lengthy than even The Great Awakening. It's a study in it's own right and one that seems to get confused with authoratative updates.
With JOS falsely claiming Q is behind the McAffee content, exposure and discrediting of both can't be far behind. I'd like to make it clear that JOS is not Q content.
I think it would really help clarify our focus if we make Festival 'home of opposition research' and have opposition research ping lists. All who post content by those who hate Q, unvalidated people who claim to be a Q insider, or claim spiritually authoritative knowledge of Q/Q++ can pool their content there. We'd know where to look for updates (check Festival) and again, those with particular interests could join ping lists.
This would help with the issue I mentioned to you privately in the past - the JessieC content appears to be potentially destructive (spiritually) to the unfamiliar. But most importantly, citing these sources on thread as authoritative creates confusion.