Durham’s seeming lack of urgency strongly suggests that he has already found overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy stretching into 2017 - and maybe beyond - so he is not concerned about statute of limitation issues.— shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) October 2, 2021
replies:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
shipwreckedcrew.substack.com
@shipwreckedcrew
·
1h
Replying to
@shipwreckedcrew
Elias gets you at least to Podesta and a couple others who would get you to Hillary. So it’s possible.
Grump
@Ken53431415
·
1h
Replying to
@shipwreckedcrew
Question Ship,
If someone was involved with a long term conspiracy but they themselves were not involved after a certain point does the timer for the SOL start when THEIR contributions to the conspiracy ended or when the last act of the conspiracy occurred?
Make sense?
Doc
@DocMonterey
·
14m
Replying to
@shipwreckedcrew
There is no SOL violation if the indictments have already been made. They don’t have to be announced to the public. In cases where there are potentially hundreds of possible targets indictments of co-conspirators arrests seen made until they have everything snd everyone