IMO another O’Keefe fizzle ... it’s interesting + pertinent but not the bombshell as advertised.
My guess is the use of baby parts may have some traction,hard to say,you may be right.
“IMO another O’Keefe fizzle ... it’s interesting + pertinent but not the bombshell as advertised.”
Maybe. In and of itself it doesn’t seem to be a big deal. I may be misremembering what Pfizer said about their Notavax. I thought they had already said it was tested on, but not made with, fetal tissue.
If that is the case, then we are just talking about a stupid email from a stupid director who should have just directed the person asking her for a response to restate what Pfizer has already publicly stated.
The mystery to me here is how the whistleblower got the email string. She doesn’t seem high up enough to have been involved with it.
I’m wondering if someone, such as Advait Badkar, gave them to her because he wanted to be an “unnamed co-whistleblower.” If so, what other emails did he give other people?
I eagerly await what the Catholic Freepers have to say about what the Vatican supposedly understood and had to say about the Pfizer vax and if they think this changes anything.