Posted on 10/01/2021 10:10:36 AM PDT by ransomnote
ThankQs, HoneysuckleTN, for the links!
Pingout!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3999784/posts?page=682#682
Q is a team, not an individual.
Steve Van Doorn wrote:
“At 37:00 Juan O Savin claims Q is now running OfficialMcAfee on telegram.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QnHaTFFsO0QJ/
If you want to financially support OfficialMcAfee IE:”Q” here are their Bitcoin address.
https://t.me/McafeeAfterlife/380
My opinion of this. I have two ways of looking at this
1. If Juan O Savin is correct then McAfee was Q and his crew needs financial support now that he is dead. Assuming this was true the deep state would’ve loved to pin that on him before he died. Proving Q wasn’t who he claimed he was.
2. Juan O Savin has lost his mind if he thinks this LARP is Q.
Either way I used to like Juan O Savin.”
What a doofus! Clearly Not saying let’s go Brandon.
Interesting factoid (no source at the moment) about the ICIJ who apparently put together the Pandora Papers. The ICIJ is funded by George Soros’ Open Society foundation, would be interesting to delve into these other donors. So...seems any info needs to be double checked. Soros trying to get rid of rivals?
https://www.icij.org/about/our-supporters/
Our Supporters
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists is a nonprofit organization. We give our work away for free.
But cross-border investigative journalism is among the most expensive and riskiest in the world. We rely heavily on charitable foundations and on financial support from the public. Without your help, we cannot exist.
We welcome individual donations in support of our work. You can make a gift online here. Any help, no matter how small, is most welcome.
We are incredibly grateful to our supporters who make this work possible. The following list (current as of June 2021) includes institutional and major individual donors who provided support in 2019-2021:
Adessium Foundation
Arnold Ventures
Bay and Paul Foundations
Barbara Streisand
Bertha Foundation
Ford Foundation
Franklin Philanthropic Foundation
Fritt Ord Foundation
Fund for Nonprofit News at The Miami Foundation (NewsMatch)
Green Park Foundation
Hollywood Foreign Press Association
Hurd Foundation
John and Florence Newman Foundation
Jonathan Logan Family Foundation
Luminate
KCIJ Newstapa
Meryl Streep
Nationale Postcode Loterij
Norad
Open Society Foundations
Swedish Postcode Foundation
Tinius Trust
Wellspring Philanthropic Fund
We are also grateful to have received in-kind support from Australian philanthropist and businessman Graeme Wood.
Lemme have a link when you get a chance. I have guests coming shortly and will check in later this evening.
ThankQs, LJ, for the research !
Pinging MqD !!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3999784/posts?page=725#725
Note my comment below listing the donors for the ICIJ. Very interesting. What is the motive for this endeavor, one wonders.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3999784/posts?page=725#725
I noticed in one article I skimmed that Putin is not mentioned by name, for instance. But headlines imply he’s a biggie in their papers.
The donors that I recognize are hardcore enemy, so there has to be a hidden motive for this. These “independent journalists” need to be looked at as well as the donors. At least one is from the BBC, not noted for honest and open journalism.
YAY. Hope not another big storm on the horizon.
List of the journalists in ICIJ funded by commies, if I have time tomorrow I may look into some of them.
Contributors: Michael W. Hudson, Scilla Alecci, Will Fitzgibbon, Agustin Armendariz, Sydney P. Freedberg, Margot Gibbs, Malia Politzer, Delphine Reuter, Emilia Díaz-Struck, Gerard Ryle, Ben Hallman, Dean Starkman, Fergus Shiel, Serdar Vardar and Pelin Ünker (DW Turkey), Elyssa Christine Lopez and Karol Ilagan (Philippine Center of Investigative Journalism), Pavla Holcová (Investigace, Czech Republic), Hala Nassredine (Daraj, Lebanon), Allan de Abreu (Revista Piauí, Brazil), Leo Sisti and Paolo Biondani (L’Espresso, Italy), Simon Goodley (The Guardian, U.K.), Ritu Sarin (The Indian Express), Nassos Stylianou (BBC, U.K.), Francisco Rodriguez and Enrique Naveda (Plaza Pública, Guatemala), Debra Cenziper (Washington Post, U.S.), Jelena Cosic, Spencer Woodman, Brenda Medina, Maggie Michael, Richard H.P. Sia, Kathleen Cahill, Joe Hillhouse, Mia Zuckerkandel, Asraa Mustufa, Hamish Boland-Rudder, Miguel Fiandor Gutiérrez, Pierre Romera, Madeline O’Leary, Tom Stites, Kathryn Kranhold, Margot Williams, Antonio Cucho Gamboa, Soline Ledésert, Bruno Thomas, Anne L’Hôte, Madeline O’Leary, Maxime Vanza Lutaonda, Denise Hassanzade Ajiri, Jesús Escudero, Marcos García Rey, Mago Torres, Karrie Kehoe, Sean McGoey, Anisha Kohli, Fakhar Durrani, Carlos Monteiro, Douglas Dalby and Laura Bullard.
Satellite Imagery Contradicts Reports Of Foreign Aircraft At Bagram Air Base 42 min ago
(so jaundiced by fake news, I just don’t believe anything.. true or false?)
I am about tapped out with all that I can come up with for the flyer. I will be posting my myth-fact sets for this later this evening.
Based on Freepmail I received about this, I wanted to explain “my vision” for this flyer because I evidently did not make it clear earlier.
Thank you to all who wrote me with feedback.
My thinking about this flyer is explained in the points below, in no particular order.
1. There is no telling what will will work to persuade any one individual. People are different, and different things work on different people.
2. This flyer is simply an attempt to use one technique-basically reverse psychology- on the theory that it will work on some people whereas other techniques have failed.
3. A lot of people believe myths about Covid-19 that are simply not true, such as that it results in high rates of hospitalization among people of various ages.
4. You will find that in some cases the “myths” in the flyer are not that far from the “facts.” This is purposeful. I don’t want to hit people head-on with harsh differences between the two because I think people are too dug-in to their positions. And I want it to be a bit mysterious as to who, or what kind of people, this flyer is coming from.
5. For instance, if I present a “myth” such as, “25% of all people who get Covid must be hospitalized for it” and then a “fact,” such as “only 5% of people are hospitalized,” I am afraid the document gives the appearance as coming from a right-wing nutter trying too hard to argue that Covid-19 is overblown.
6. By framing the myth more as “Very few people are hospitalized for Covid” and then the fact that up to 5% are hospitalized, the reader might scratch his head a bit and say, “Wait, is that a typo? Did they mean 50, not 5? I have to look this up. Five isn’t that high really and not much different than a few. I’m confused.”
7. The reader doesn’t really have to look it up so much as type in the information for the parenthetical (or endnote- I haven’t decided) source given on the flyer. Most of the sources are middle of the road or left of center.
8. The sets are meant to be a tad confounding— but hopefully not confusing— and will hopefully provoke curiousity in some people.
9. A primary audience for the flyers would be college or high school students, who might be starting to get tired of all the Covid rules and starting to question what is going on.
10. The header at the top of the flyer will be something like, “Alarming myths Covid skeptics believe about the danger of Covid and facts to refute them.” There will be nothing more said and no made-up name of the “group” putting out the flyer. The less said, the more mysterious these flyers appear. The more mysterious, the more confounding.
I am hoping the header itself is mysterious and people wonder:
“What is really so alarming about these myths? Who exactly are the Covid skeptics? Covid deniers? Covid alarmists?”
_________________________
Back in grad school, I had to take a required theory class. The first day, the professor handed out a sheet with 20 questions. It was an exercise to prepare us for the idea that his theory class was going to blow our mind and require us to think about things in a whole new light.
I kept that paper with questions and used it in teaching my own classes. I don’t know where it is now, but I remember two questions.
1. What animal in Africa kills the most people?
2. How far can a person run into the woods?
Some people gave lions as the answer. Boring. A couple people said crocodiles. This is better in that crocs kill more people than do lions. A couple gave hippos. I’m not sure they kill more than crocs do, but kudos to these students for knowing hippos are meaner than many people realize and are considered dangerous.
A few out-of-the-box thinkers gave man as the answer, per all the sectarian conflict in Africa. There are certainly more deaths at the hand of human animals than all other mammals and reptiles combined per year in Africa.
But the correct answer is mosquitos. Not many people thought that small.
For the woods question, some people said it depends on fitness level and will differ by individual. Other said until it gets dark or the person trips and sprains an ankle. Some people gave miles or times at which the average person will have reached the end of his endurance.
The correct answer is halfway. Once you run and reach the halfway point in the woods and you continue running, you are running out of the woods.
Only a few people got that.
There was an interesting correlation between the quality of answers and how well people did in the course.
Anyway, think of the flyers like this little test in that the flyers are meant to scramble and hopefully open up people’s brains a bit about Covid, just like the 20 questions and discussing the answers was meant to open our brains and prepare us for a theory course.
Rut Roh. This data release may be coming to us courtesy funding from people like George Soros (Little Jeremiah's post below) and others I don't trust. WHich may mean he's punishing certain people or setting it up to frame President Trump (giving up some corrupt lefties to 'validate' false claims against President Trump or those who support him)
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/01/21 Vol.373, Q Day 1435, little jeremiah wrote: |
Interesting factoid (no source at the moment) about the ICIJ who apparently put together the Pandora Papers. The ICIJ is funded by George Soros’ Open Society foundation, would be interesting to delve into these other donors. So...seems any info needs to be double checked. Soros trying to get rid of rivals? https://www.icij.org/about/our-supporters/ Our Supporters But cross-border investigative journalism is among the most expensive and riskiest in the world. We rely heavily on charitable foundations and on financial support from the public. Without your help, we cannot exist. We welcome individual donations in support of our work. You can make a gift online here. Any help, no matter how small, is most welcome. We are incredibly grateful to our supporters who make this work possible. The following list (current as of June 2021) includes institutional and major individual donors who provided support in 2019-2021: Adessium Foundation |
| In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Report: Michael Flynn Allegedly Received $200,000 in Undisclosed Secret Payments, E. Pluribus Unum wrote: |
| Anonymous Source = Lie John Durham just confirmed this for us with Russiagate. Rolling Stoned must not have gotten the memo. |
Posted on 10/3/2021, 4:27:42 PM by lightman
Dr. Anthony Fauci suggested Sunday that those who remain unvaccinated should not be able to work or attend in-person school until they choose to receive a vaccination against Covid-19.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
