Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This is not a foreign concept. There are malpractice claims made and adjudicated every day. This idea simply adds the COVID vax from the blanket legal liability protection they enjoy and we lose.
1 posted on 09/25/2021 6:32:03 PM PDT by icclearly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: icclearly

“Trust me, I’m a scientist!”


2 posted on 09/25/2021 6:34:47 PM PDT by Grampa Dave ( In your private, business, social and what ever life!: "All ways, ask Cui Bono?"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

The government and Big Pharma have immunity.

The average private business doesn’t.

So they have to be very careful in any mandates.


3 posted on 09/25/2021 6:37:05 PM PDT by 2banana (Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly
42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22

No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.

4 posted on 09/25/2021 6:37:55 PM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

There’s the CICP compensation scheme.

https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/faq#covid


5 posted on 09/25/2021 6:38:32 PM PDT by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

“Beware the Jabberwock”


10 posted on 09/25/2021 7:12:53 PM PDT by conserv8 (Always something hungry for something out there. Be careful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

I have taken to calling it the Fauci Flu.


11 posted on 09/25/2021 7:13:52 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

We don’t know a thing about who or what they might do to the civilians in this country. I have reports from doctors who knew fauci when... and he is dirty as can be... he had/has plans to use this “invention” to kill.

and they are making all take a vax? without knowing the ramifications ... they are taking fauci as a good person and trustworthy... i take him as a criminal.. and our jobs and our lives depend on HIS vax for HIS made virus?

Something wrong with this picture!

Check out this Dr’s opinion..
https://americasvoice.news/playlists/cowboy-logic/


13 posted on 09/25/2021 7:16:39 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

42 U.S. CODE § 300AA–22 - STANDARDS OF RESPONSIBILITY

(a) GENERAL RULE

Except as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) State law shall apply to a civil action brought for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death.

(b) UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS; WARNINGS

(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title (including regulations issued under such provisions) applicable to the vaccine and related to vaccine-related injury or death for which the civil action was brought unless the plaintiff shows—
(A) that the manufacturer engaged in the conduct set forth in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 300aa–23(d)(2) of this title, or
(B) by clear and convincing evidence that the manufacturer failed to exercise due care notwithstanding its compliance with such Act and section (and regulations issued under such provisions).

(c) DIRECT WARNINGS No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.

(d) CONSTRUCTION The standards of responsibility prescribed by this section are not to be construed as authorizing a person who brought a civil action for damages against a vaccine manufacturer for a vaccine-related injury or death in which damages were denied or which was dismissed with prejudice to bring a new civil action against such manufacturer for such injury or death.

(e) PREEMPTION No State may establish or enforce a law which prohibits an individual from bringing a civil action against a vaccine manufacturer for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death if such civil action is not barred by this part.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXI, § 2122, as added Pub. L. 99–660, title III, § 311(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3773; amended Pub. L. 100–203, title IV, § 4302(b)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–221.)


17 posted on 09/25/2021 8:09:56 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly
It is almost funny, people that are complaining about lack of ability to sue on vaccines, were very likely the same people wanting to limit medical and malpractice suits in the past. Maybe they are rethinking that?

Personally, I have always argued that anyone should be able to sue anyone, for as much is the feel appropriate. It is up to a judge and jury to decide if it is appropriate.

18 posted on 09/25/2021 8:11:22 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

Vaccine developers like Pfizer and Modern a have been granted blanket immunity for at least four years. No lawsuits can be filed.


19 posted on 09/25/2021 8:11:56 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly

Only the manufacturers of the vaccine have been given legal immunity for their drugs under EUA.

Anyone else involved with forcing this on you is in violation of the Nuremberg Code, as well as US 18 242/241, not to mention all sorts of other human rights abuses.

I can’t believe businesses are so gullible to think they are immune from prosecution for forcing this on people.


25 posted on 09/25/2021 9:35:03 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icclearly; Safrguns; All

As mentioned above damages would be addressed by the “CICP”...also this topic is covered by “The PREP Act” (enacted in 2005, and activated for COVID-19 in 2020 by the PDJT HHS). Looks like businesses would have to apply in advance for “Prep Act” liability protection:

https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp

https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/default.aspx

https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insights/hhs-prep-act-liability-covid-19.html


27 posted on 09/26/2021 2:25:04 AM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson