[blueplum]

Let's have a meeting!

[Widget Jr]

But they are a great way to bilk taxpayers, divide up the planet between bureaucrats, politicians and corporations, and make Al Gore rich off trading carbon credits.

[FreedomPoster]

And fly there on private jets!

[Nateman]

Its been a a scam from day one. Plants take Co2 from the air and even expand their populations with increases of that gas.

[lizma2]

Dinosaur era had 5 times today’s CO2. Plants were huge.

And now that’s a bad thing?

[BiglyCommentary]

Gambia? They all run around in loin cloths and use wood fires to cook and heat which give off carbon dioxide. They are evil carbon emitters.

[equaviator]

So now they want to say that if you're in denial of this threatening new climate change, you could be in denial of anything, and that's what makes skeptics and deniers so dangerous. "They", being those involved in the perpetuation of myth and misinformation and actual believers who tend to be wary of, if not hostile towards non-believers, skeptics and deniers. For humans to assume that our mere existence is now a threat to what sustains all of life on earth is folly in any language. It is all just talk, and if talk is all they have to go on then we can assume that in general, it's a piss-poor quality of meaning which they derive.

[FroggyTheGremlim]

All Climate Change theories are based on MODELS.

Some dingbat professor draws a line on a chalkboard. The line invariably goes up.

Then other dingbat professors get together in seminars and use that line to tell us what the climate will be.

Hell, they can’t even tell us if it will rain next Tuesday, but their chalkboard line says we’ll all be burned to a crisp in 9.7 years.

They ignore important contributers like the sun, volcanos, ... and use their models to scare us. It’s all bogus quackery.

[BobL]

“If you want to reduce greenhouse emissions from electricity...Begin a long-term project to convert all or nearly all of the grid to nuclear power. No other method has ever worked or come close.”

Except that approach is NOT permitted by the treaties. So the author can try again.