An Aspiring Physician's personal blog trumps real doctors?
Posted on 09/20/2021 5:03:44 AM PDT by Candor7
pink slips https://headlinehealth.com/pink-slips-continue-for-unvaccinated-workers/?utm_medium=email
sars https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1
Fauci’s monkey https://headlinehealth.com/faucis-monkey-experiment-did-not-work-out-as-planned/?utm_medium=email
Are you talking about HCQ?
Still available.
BUMP
An Aspiring Physician's personal blog trumps real doctors?
Kroger’s big sale item this week was 99 cent chicken, Farm Raised in US, contains CARGENATIVES. Walked past the fools grabbing it, and bought the better higher brand. While I don’t fall for the ‘organic’ unless I planted it, and know what is in the produce I do pay big attention to meats. There are just the 2 of us old geezers. Today is our Anniversary. I get to eat out.
https://www.clayandbuck.com/epidemiologist-calls-in-with-whirlwind-of-information/
Yes...and Parks is a "real doctor" the way Jill Biden is.
“Wow, even my 3 year old can come up with a better argument than, “Because you are stupid...” which is all your post boils down to. “
Congratulations, your 3 year old is much wiser than most of the anti vaccers here. Look the numbers up yourself...I have already...I truly think most of you antivaccers are so far gone that you can no longer discern the truth. This article is so stupid it really does not deserve any argument. The sources you get your information from are lying to you...try looking at valid information.
This one in particular addresses her testimony point by point. Addressing Dr. Christina Parks’s Claims
However, this rebuttal is full of false claims notable the big lie; "Parks then comes to the central thesis of her testimony: that COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission. This claim is false and readily verifiable as such. Firstly, as a baseline, if infection cannot occur (sterilizing immunity) then there is no potential for onward transmission. mRNA vaccines in particular have demonstrated the ability to prevent infections."
We now know the pandemic is among both the vaccinated as well as the unvaccinated. In other words, these particular vaccines will not stop the spread.
The issue your describe hinges on the definition of “gene therapy.”
Dr. Parks says that the body receives genetically induced instructions which cause the injectees body to
create spike proteins. This is true.
These proteins damage people and cause the mutation of the virus so it can evolve to survive.In fact the Covid variants have adapted by evolving different lengths and shapes of spike protein that cannot be blocked by any vaccination. This fact is purposefully obscured by Pharmaceutical scientists who work for both government and public health agencies.
Now as to Edward Nirenberg’s attempt to confuse the issue, he is defining gene therapy as a medically induced change to the human genome, and then sayiong that mRNA is NOT gene therapy. From the point of view of genetic science, this is actually an attempt by Nirenberg to split hairs . There are no changes to the genome of the injectee’s body.So terefore it is not gene therapy.
So Nirenberg actually obscures the issue with a narrow scientific definition according to genetic science, while Parks reveals tha actual genetic based sequence of spike proteiin production from a vaccinologists point of view.
Nirenberg is wrong in what he has written, he does not even address the issue.
Cognito Ergo Sum.
See my post # 50. Its a specious argument designed to confuse.
“So says some anonymous FRexpert whose counter argument amounts to nothing more than gutter talk. Gosh, you really convinced me.”
There is no point to try to convince you of anything, you ignore valid information, you refuse to discern truth...you are a waste of time...but, you and those like you are entertaining...kind of like the flat earthers although they at least have a bit more logic behind them...
Couldn't be more specialized for this very virus and the jab
https://heightzone.com/who-is-dr-christina-parks-why-is-she-banned-from-youtube/
Yes...and Parks is a “real doctor” the way Jill Biden is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes she is:
A Qualified witness giving recorded live testimony before a committee of a legisltaive body.
Jill Biden is a psychologist, not a medical physician like Parks.
Wrong...the author uses a conventional definition, the same one regulatory agencies use.
Gene therapy
In short, there is no reasonable basis under which COVID-19 vaccines (or, in general, any vaccine against any infectious disease) could be considered a form of gene therapy. Some regulatory definitions even explicitly state that vaccines against infectious diseases are not gene therapy. The FDA does not regulate them as though they are gene therapy, nor does any other regulatory body that I am aware of. Some regulatory definitions even explicitly state that vaccines against infectious diseases are not gene therapy. The FDA does not regulate them as though they are gene therapy, nor does any other regulatory body that I am aware of.
Expression of the spike protein induced by these mRNA vaccines is transient and done only twice (as the vaccines are given only twice- ergo they don’t function as any kind of replacement gene therapy), it fulfills no known therapeutic role (it is preventive to protect against COVID-19, especially severe COVID-19), and it is given to people who are healthy. It does not qualify as gene therapy (though it would be completely irrelevant even if it did as this says nothing about its safety or effectiveness).
NAILED!
My sentiment from th beginning, if we all just were honest about science, science, doctors, phd’s etc have kinda been saying all along we do not KNOW everything about this, that alone should negate any mandate.
Expression of the spike protein induced by these mRNA vaccines is transient and done only twice (as the vaccines are given only twice- ergo they don’t function as any kind of replacement gene therapy),>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Like I said, he is using a genetic science definition. He refuses to address the problem of spike protein fixity in the vaccines.Again, obscuring the actual question and not answering it.
Dr, Parks address the issue of spike protein variation and its origins from variants as a survival mechanism. Nirenberg is purposefully obscutring the issue.Its just gobbledee gook designed to not join issue with what Dr. Parks has said.Nirenberg purposefully avoids the issue.
Scientific propaganda by Nirenberg. He works it much the same way that pro global warming scientists do when they are looking for federal grant money to prove non existant global warming.
Dr. Christina Parks received her Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology from the University of Michigan in 1999. She did her graduate research in the field of cytokine signaling.
Dr. Christina Parks received her Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology from the University of Michigan in 1999. She did her graduate research in the field of cytokine signaling.
Couldn’t be more specialized for this very virus and the jab
https://heightzone.com/who-is-dr-christina-parks-why-is-she-banned-from-youtube/
Lol...this is exactly why I called your thread a “rabbit hole” at the outset.
I’m outta here!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.