Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlbedfor

How right you are! They denied her a drug that at the very most would do nothing, and at the very best would save her life. Ghoulish.


9 posted on 09/13/2021 12:51:17 PM PDT by refreshed (But we preach Christ crucified... 1 Corinthians 1:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: refreshed

One of the issues could be that you cant know without studies that it wont harm you as the disease progresses past a certain point

I think this is why you cant get the antibody infusion past a certain point. There is some evidence it could harm you.


13 posted on 09/13/2021 12:53:39 PM PDT by RummyChick (Bagram was the most logical exit point. Stand up and justify your decision (hat tip Larrytown))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: refreshed; rlbedfor

How long you two gloating jackasses been waiting to mock a causality who’s medical choices you disapprove of?


31 posted on 09/13/2021 1:12:56 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: refreshed

Judges


43 posted on 09/13/2021 1:30:15 PM PDT by smalltownslick (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: refreshed

“and at the very best would save her life”

You mean “at the very worst” for Democrats


53 posted on 09/13/2021 1:42:21 PM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson