* Warfarin, a rat poison, became Coumadin, an anti-coagulant that has also saved countless lives by preventing blood clots.
* Alexander Fleming's Petri dishes containing staphylococcus bacteria, gave us Penicillin, which has saved millions of lives.
So, If rat poison and mold can save lives, why not a "horse-dewormer"?
Ping for your interest
Botulism toxin might be one that seems popular with the Hollywood crowd.
They denounce it because they were told to by Fauci.
All i see is that for people sure saying they were desperate to get treatments out as soon as possible, they sure spent quite a bit of their energy demonizing and ridiculing ivermectin. And any other potential treatment that wasn’t a new treatment by big pharma.
They couldn’t get EUA for the experimental pharma treatments if they would have said hcq or ivermectin could be beneficial treatments.
This tying rat poison to Warfarin’s success and assuming it is true for ivermectin is the correlational fallacy also known as cum hoc ergo propter hoc (Lat., “with this therefore because of this”). This fallacy happens when you mistakenly interpret two things found together as being causally related. Two things may correlate without a causal relation, or they may have some third factor causing both of them to occur. Or perhaps both things just, coincidentally, happened together. Correlation doesn’t prove causation.
Ivermectin has been used for decades for people with scabies.
Bookmark
Massive ‘Horse’ Lies About Nobel Prize Winning Treatment
Just a question that I’ve been wondering about. Why was there a big switch for promoting ivermectin over HCQ?
I guess I missed the reason for the switch.
Excellent headline.
Will have to remember for future use.