Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

It’s been 30 years since I studied nuclear physics but as I recall the purpose of the high strength magnets are to suspend a ball of superheated plasma within a strong magnetic field at the center of a superconducting toroidal electromagnet, mostly because, you know, it’s superheated and if it touched anything bad stuff would happen. So use magnetic fields to suspend it floating. Cool.

But the energy it took to actually heat the plasma up and power the magnets was so much that it has never been worth it. What has fundamentally changed? Stronger electromagnets = good. Do they require less power?


5 posted on 09/08/2021 2:04:48 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

Stronger electromagnets = good. Do they require less power?


Both less power, and denser fields, with superconductivity the heat output is tremendously reduced. With high temperature superconductors, the total power put through them can be higher, which can make them much smaller - an efficiency which feeds back on itself making the whole operation smaller and use less power.

The relationship isn’t linear, it is roughly x^3.

Here’s a cute video on magnetic fields and desktop plasma which might be interesting. Most of it is probably old hat to you, but there are some more recent things included.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2QaTyDJDEI


10 posted on 09/08/2021 2:33:29 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson