What relevance does that have to my question?
What relevance? Let's see....
You know full well that you're game playing is only intended to delegitimize Ransomnote as somebody lacking the 'medical training' to post and opine on this subject. You also know full well that no medical training is required to do what she does. And yet you ride this dead horse.
Its clear you have no medical training of your own, Pelham, or you would have laid it out. You have sleazy lawyer tactics, because that is what you are trained in.
Here's how you should have approached your line of inquiry.
Pelham:
"I have several degrees in Microbiology, Virology, and Immunology. I have a PHD in Medicine. I have much training and education in Vaccines, which is the subject under discussion. You?".
That's how it should have went. That way, your tactic wouldn't be so transparent.
You still have not explained why your opinion matters or why anybody should consider you worthy of sitting in judgement of somebody observably smarter and better informed than you.
That's how its relevant.
#FailedLawyerTactic
#DidYouProsecuteOJ

The last sentence tells you the relevance