I’ve never been like that so I don’t fully understand it. I have zero female friends.
Because they don’t think, they feel, so they are easily misled.
They are more likely to be ruled by emotions.
Communism superficially sounds so nice.
Short answer: they want to be taken care of. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s just as natural that men want to take care of women.
My theory is they buried themselves in student loan debt for easy degrees that let them party and have sex and abortions at will and when they graduated and got $30,000 a year jobs as teachers and social workers and public defenders they realized they were never going to pay off their six-figure loans they went insane with hate.
Whatta bout the other 56 genders?
The leftists have learned how to play on emotions.
Men are more likely to be driven by logic.
generally, more women than men value security over liberty.
the limiting case of valuing security over liberty guaranteed by a constitutional republic is a dictatorship, communism, or some other autocracy.
therefore, generally, more women than men value autocracy over our current form of government, which is a constitutional republic.
therefore, if there are more women than men and a tiny majority of women favor security over liberty, and this tiny majority of women, presuming the number of women voters is roughly equal to the number of men voters, votes counter to the continued existence of a constitutional republic.
All the liberal women I know, and you’re right it’s most, don’t think about it. They have no power of reasoning.
And fatherless children often learn that.
Combine the two and you’ll see it match up with observable society.
They have replaced the need for men with government. They can have absolute power over any kids they decide to have. If they were married, they would have to share control and compromise.
First, I am a woman. Two points:
1. Women are generally stupid and vacuous. My sister is a lib Dem and buys a $10 Starbucks coffee every day; mocha and all the goodies. I would never do that.
2. Out of necessity, women have had to place their trust in the man who impregnated them, in order to protect their children. He must be as strong and fast as possible; in today’s world, that means connections and power.
Now I have forgotten the original question. Hoping I’m posting on the correct thread! LOL
I think you have it backwards.
Ask yourself why Communism seems always to be with us.
It’s because half of us are women.
To pretend that men and women are the same and interchangeable is idiotic. Men and women are complimentary, as the left hand is to the right. There is much overlap, but nature, or God if you like, is not wasteful. Your hands, together, are more capable than two of the same one would be.
Traits of male and female are not, of course, exclusively tied to ones sex, either. Some men are more like most women, and some women are more like most men.
Because no matter what they say, they still depend on someone else to take care of them. Individualism is a concept they reject. Group think is what sustains them.
I don’t know the answer to your question, but the fact that you asked it demonstrates why the 19th amendment destroyed the U.S.A.
I am a conservative woman. I judge things that don’t make sense by Occam’s Razor, not by emotion. Common sense seems to be rare in both sexes today.
I believe that, in general, women value safety and security very highly.
Men value independence and liberty.
Again, there are exceptions, but these are generalizations from what I’ve observed.
Ergo, women believe that collectivism provides them with the best chance at safety and security. Of course, history teaches us otherwise.
Females (not all, but a large number) spend their 20s riding the CC. They have lots of good solid guys (not Nice Guys) wanting to date them and pursue a relationship, but they don’t want a good guy, they want a player “bad boy” type. But something happens to females when they hit 30 and up; they “hit the wall.” The Bad Boys they were able to snag in their 20s no longer want them...at least for nothing more than a quick fling. Nope, the bad boy players are still snagging and bagging chicks in their 20s.
Since these players no longer want these females now in their 30s and 40s, these females try to go and hit up the good guys who they rejected when they were in their 20s. What’s happening more and more, is that these good guys see these skanks for who they are, and what their true motives are, and are rejecting these women. These women are looking for a provider, nothing more, and guys are finally on to their little scam.
Women age like milk, men age like wine! Sad women think their 20s will last forever!🤣
here is a mind experiment (you are traveling in another dimension... a dimension of the mind...):
you are in a crowded cafe somewhere in the USA during cafe business hours. you become aware that there is a taliban army approaching, and that it will arrive at the cafe in about 30 minutes. maybe someone sent you a video of the imminent invation at the city’s border which you just received by cell phone. however, this information only becomes known to you and no one else in the cafe.
naturally (naturally?) you immediately stand up and announce to everyone in the cafe that according to your reliable source, the taliban will be there in 30 minutes. and here is the proof (on a cell phone, which somehow you could and do display on the cafe tv monitor screens in this hypothetical scenario).
at the end of the video, more women in the cafe than not will just look at you, give you a moment’s worth of a blank stare, and then either go back to their coffee or decry you as unworthy of anyone’s attention.
according to my conjecture, the reason is that such women have evolved over time to accept any immediate or imminent show of force or power, regardless of its (lack of) legitimacy or its (lack of) mercy.
if your cafe happens to be in berkeley, the women will scream at you and maybe even become violent towards you (knowing that you, having identified yourself as calm and rational, most probably will remain calm and rational, while the imminently arriving taliban army will demand subservience at the points of weapons and injure or kill anyone who dares not to comply).
(aside: could even the TV series ST:Voyager be made today? iirc it featured the seven of nine character, who could resist the seemingly irresistible power of the borg even though she was a woman... implicitly, a celebration of the triumph of reason and intellect in a group setting over brute force and emotion).