Posted on 09/02/2021 7:16:46 PM PDT by SteveH
why are so many women evolutionarily inclined to be liberal/socialist/communist/fascist?
my observation is that many more women than men seem to fit these categories, which imho differ only in degree.
my own conjecture:
women have been evolved to submit to the force and power of authority. in prehistory, women, having generally less strength and less weight than men, have taken follower social status as the primary way in which both they and their offspring maximize their survival and reproduction chances.
the us constitution upholds minimal government. minimal government is antithetical to maximum force and maximum power.
thus, the us constitution is often belittled as "unimportant" "irrelevant" "wrong" or "patriarchical" by many women.
many ancient cultures apparently implicitly understood this and thus usually did not give women any chance to assume a position of ruling a group.
one of the few ancient cultures that survives is islam. islam does not seem to offer women any leadership roles or any rights equal to those of males. yet, many women support islam, even while asserting feminist ideology.
the evolutionary attraction of women to force and power is the only explanation that i can come up with that resolves the dichotomy of women supporting a culture which denies womens' rights.
by allowing women equal or better political power, therefore, it could be construed as opening the gates of modern civilization to the islamic, socialist, or communist strains of cultural barbarianism.
i am not certain whether a solution exists, but perhaps someone should find a solution quickly, before modern civilization is overrun.
before the 19th amendment passed, the destructive effect of women on modern civilization was not a significant problem.
what am i missing?
The Father
Christ
Man
Woman
Children
That’s the biblical New Covenant chain of command in terms of headship/authority
Satan has no problem being the authority over any man, woman or child.
There’s a reason widows and fatherless were to be shown extra care.
They literally have just lost their headship/authority.
Which is their Husband and Father
Satan can fill that role as quickly as any human.
Satan has all the powers and principalities to sell to his new wife and children
Satan can do that in a religious home as well as a secular home
If Christ is not the head of the woman’s father,then not the head of the woman’s husband, Satan has an opportunity to fill that role as headship/authority.
Nancy Pelosi is a cursed woman.
With Satan in her ear.
Telling her she is exactly where she should be.
That’s not any better than any of Satans other powers and principalities on the globe.
The solution is Satan locked away and his sinking kingdom to fall.
So Christ reigns
I’ll presume you forgot the quotation marks. :)
Anyways, it tomorrow already. I need to go hit the sack for another day of clearing brush on the land with mr. mm. Got a lot of invasive plants we discovered growing on it.
> As opposed to all the great male ones we’ve had, like Johnson, Carter, Bush, obama, biden, schumer, McConnell, Graham, Romney, McCain…
So this judging of character by the worst common denominator leads you where logically? because you are not making any logical sense.
some men are bad. therefore, try a woman.
...let’s see how this works in a different context.
some airplane pilots are bad. therefore, let’s try a garbage collector as a pilot. it should be ok! i feel it!! if you disagree i will have to put you down as being anti-garbage collector! shame!
You are traveling in another dimension...
LOL
So you are basing your whole claim on conjecture and trying to claim you’re more logical cause you’re a guy?
What a fail.
or a Hillary? or a Ferraro? or a Fiorina? or a Warren?
The Taliban may not my favorites, but they certainly have women figured out.
OK, I’ll list all the great male political leaders.
Trump. Reagan. George Washington.
Your turn.
Give me a list of all the great male political leaders and I can come up with scores more of despots.
And give me a list of all the horrible women political leaders who have instituted communist regimes.
If that is an example of male logic, it’s no wonder this country is in the trouble it’s in.
Not only do you fail at logic, you are not even being coherent.
Why did men quit being men? And which came first: men quit being men or the women’s movement?
I know that 1963 was the year that Betty Friedan wrote “The Feminine Mystique”, which started the women’s revolution. That and Helen Reddy’s ear splitting ‘I Am Woman” war cry.
Are you for real condoning the Taliban’s treatment of women?
> So you are basing your whole claim on conjecture and trying to claim you’re more logical cause you’re a guy?
> What a fail.
You do not know me, much less determine if i am indeed a “fail” Your standard snide elevator message to a man who is not a cuck perhaps? I’m actually doing much better than OK at the moment. I am content with myself, and my ego is in no way shattered by any snide elevator message you or any femi-notsee has to offer me. Hey, but please please please continue to enjoy your embittered feminist self. You and she (alt-you) deserve each other.
Now. Discuss amongst yourselves— I am verklemmt.
LOL
> Not only do you fail at logic, you are not even being coherent.
I am merely using... or should i say re-investing in... your “logic.”
I my not know you but already I feel sorry for Mr. MM.
((Sob!))
(((Group hug, everyone?!)))
> I know that 1963 was the year that Betty Friedan wrote “The Feminine Mystique”, which started the women’s revolution. That and Helen Reddy’s ear splitting ‘I Am Woman” war cry.
I am old enough to remember 1963.
Things went seriously sideways in 1963.
IMO, there are too many situations where the symptoms of a problem are blamed for it.
It’s like how Catholics blame contraception for the problems we have, when they don’t stop to realize, that it the problems didn’t already exist, contraception would not have been so widely and quickly accepted.
Likewise for feminism. I see that as more of a symptom of a problem that is getting the blame for causing it. If the problem of male leadership were not already happening, feminism would have had a much more difficult time getting off the ground.
Scripture gives instructions to men on how to lead as godly leaders. When that was abandoned by whatever means, whether by lack of provision, or by abuse for example, women will not want to submit to that kind of “leadership”. Nobody likes to have to fend for themselves, or be physically, emotionally or any other was mistreated.
Why on earth would some woman want to submit to an alcoholic husband who drinks away his paycheck and beats her? I certainly cannot fault someone for not wanting to live like that.
You are weird.
>> why are so many women liberal/socialist/communist?
Want to be single, “independent”, and work when the mood strikes?
I jest ;)
Now compare Conservative women to Marxist males.
+1
See my #96
> You are weird.
And you are a paragon of dispassionate philosophy?
Your (road) apple of insight has been received (and appropriately dispensed with).
When they were raised by single mothers.
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.