Posted on 09/02/2021 7:16:46 PM PDT by SteveH
why are so many women evolutionarily inclined to be liberal/socialist/communist/fascist?
my observation is that many more women than men seem to fit these categories, which imho differ only in degree.
my own conjecture:
women have been evolved to submit to the force and power of authority. in prehistory, women, having generally less strength and less weight than men, have taken follower social status as the primary way in which both they and their offspring maximize their survival and reproduction chances.
the us constitution upholds minimal government. minimal government is antithetical to maximum force and maximum power.
thus, the us constitution is often belittled as "unimportant" "irrelevant" "wrong" or "patriarchical" by many women.
many ancient cultures apparently implicitly understood this and thus usually did not give women any chance to assume a position of ruling a group.
one of the few ancient cultures that survives is islam. islam does not seem to offer women any leadership roles or any rights equal to those of males. yet, many women support islam, even while asserting feminist ideology.
the evolutionary attraction of women to force and power is the only explanation that i can come up with that resolves the dichotomy of women supporting a culture which denies womens' rights.
by allowing women equal or better political power, therefore, it could be construed as opening the gates of modern civilization to the islamic, socialist, or communist strains of cultural barbarianism.
i am not certain whether a solution exists, but perhaps someone should find a solution quickly, before modern civilization is overrun.
before the 19th amendment passed, the destructive effect of women on modern civilization was not a significant problem.
what am i missing?
I don’t know the answer to your question, but the fact that you asked it demonstrates why the 19th amendment destroyed the U.S.A.
I think there’s only 43 genders.
There are however, 57 states.
I am a conservative woman. I judge things that don’t make sense by Occam’s Razor, not by emotion. Common sense seems to be rare in both sexes today.
The Fatherland instead of the Father.
Only since the start of the human species.
I believe that, in general, women value safety and security very highly.
Men value independence and liberty.
Again, there are exceptions, but these are generalizations from what I’ve observed.
Ergo, women believe that collectivism provides them with the best chance at safety and security. Of course, history teaches us otherwise.
Females (not all, but a large number) spend their 20s riding the CC. They have lots of good solid guys (not Nice Guys) wanting to date them and pursue a relationship, but they don’t want a good guy, they want a player “bad boy” type. But something happens to females when they hit 30 and up; they “hit the wall.” The Bad Boys they were able to snag in their 20s no longer want them...at least for nothing more than a quick fling. Nope, the bad boy players are still snagging and bagging chicks in their 20s.
Since these players no longer want these females now in their 30s and 40s, these females try to go and hit up the good guys who they rejected when they were in their 20s. What’s happening more and more, is that these good guys see these skanks for who they are, and what their true motives are, and are rejecting these women. These women are looking for a provider, nothing more, and guys are finally on to their little scam.
Women age like milk, men age like wine! Sad women think their 20s will last forever!🤣
...So, since women can’t find a guy they’re willing to marry, or who is willing to marry them, they need the economic safety net of a socialist society, who will take care of them, and their 2 or three kids from different players they had one night stands with.
Women should never be in positions of power!
here is a mind experiment (you are traveling in another dimension... a dimension of the mind...):
you are in a crowded cafe somewhere in the USA during cafe business hours. you become aware that there is a taliban army approaching, and that it will arrive at the cafe in about 30 minutes. maybe someone sent you a video of the imminent invation at the city’s border which you just received by cell phone. however, this information only becomes known to you and no one else in the cafe.
naturally (naturally?) you immediately stand up and announce to everyone in the cafe that according to your reliable source, the taliban will be there in 30 minutes. and here is the proof (on a cell phone, which somehow you could and do display on the cafe tv monitor screens in this hypothetical scenario).
at the end of the video, more women in the cafe than not will just look at you, give you a moment’s worth of a blank stare, and then either go back to their coffee or decry you as unworthy of anyone’s attention.
according to my conjecture, the reason is that such women have evolved over time to accept any immediate or imminent show of force or power, regardless of its (lack of) legitimacy or its (lack of) mercy.
if your cafe happens to be in berkeley, the women will scream at you and maybe even become violent towards you (knowing that you, having identified yourself as calm and rational, most probably will remain calm and rational, while the imminently arriving taliban army will demand subservience at the points of weapons and injure or kill anyone who dares not to comply).
(aside: could even the TV series ST:Voyager be made today? iirc it featured the seven of nine character, who could resist the seemingly irresistible power of the borg even though she was a woman... implicitly, a celebration of the triumph of reason and intellect in a group setting over brute force and emotion).
The men who possess stability, integrity and willingness in the holistic approach to life, will absolutely not accept any woman who is not doing the same. That usually means much younger.
I don’t know if that is necessarily true. Maybe some of the louder ones are women. A lot of women may end up voting a certain way, but like many voters, they don’t really think about the big picture.
> I think there’s only 43 genders.
> There are however, 57 states.
That is not funny. I have it on authority that there are now 44 genders. Everyone with common sense knows this.
Please correct your thinking, citizen (before you are asked to attend re-education camp).
lol
Because they’re led by their emotions. Men are led by their intellect. That’s why women make such horrible national leaders.
Men and women are fundamentally different in many ways.
Vive la difference, IMO.
There are people who want so badly to believe men and women are interchangeably the same, and...they just aren’t.
Not a knock on women. We have different attributes that SHOULD compliment each other well, but...there are elements in this world that want to suppress and destroy that yin-yang relationship.
Pity.
> Stability, integrity and willingness- connections and power are why women say “all the good ones are taken”
> The men who possess stability, integrity and willingness in the holistic approach to life, will absolutely not accept any woman who is not doing the same. That usually means much younger.
I never thought of that (duh). Thanks for the insight.
(Women: this seems to be saying that for women who have no economically viable day job, the train is pulling out of the station sometime during their ... what... mid-twenties? and a corrolary being that any single or divorced woman who is older than that is a probable “unfriendly” —fair to conclude? comment??)
Women want the government make everyone be nice.
Its only SINGLE women who are that way. They want Daddy government to take care of them.
I'm going to get in trouble for this and catch hell, and I'm going to say it anyway:
Women are batsh*t crazy. There are few, if any exceptions and those exceptions can be found here on FR.
Beyond FR, they're all batsh*t crazy.
That is all.
Pretty much what Jack Nicholson said in, "As Good As It Gets".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.