Posted on 08/30/2021 5:09:33 PM PDT by dennisw
Article was for the Daily Mail. If the good, presumed British doctor, had said anything else he would have lost his license and been jailed.
The compound that served as a basis for invermectin was found i. A soil sample from Japan. But it was a lab in Britain that found it.
Article was for the Daily Mail. If the good had said anything else he would have lost his license and been jailed.
“that it poses no danger to humans if taken in the correct dose”
WHAT DO YOU KNOW!!! Some honesty.
As to the rest, I’m reading it.
Just apply and receive a doctor’s degree on the internet, then inject your knowledge to any medical subject.
From the article: “He told DailyMail.com that the study did show that ivermectin could inhibit the replication of COVID-19 virus cells, which is what many are reading from the study that makes them believe the drug has virus killing properties.”
None of the doctors that have successfully used Ivermectin to TREAT COVID-19 say that it attacks the virus - nobody has indicated that although I find it interesting that this statement from the article DOES implicate that it does? What Ivermectin DOES do successfully is fight the inflammation that is caused when our bodies fight the virus. So this treatment is to reduce our reaction to the virus and let the virus run its course without causing the inflammation in our lungs that would cause us to get much worse. There are many, many treatments that doctors prescribe to address the symptoms of illness/disease/exposure.
I remember a couple years ago that I got into some nasty poison oak and had a terrible break-out. The treatment that I was given (steroids) was not to get rid of the poison oak, it was to reduce my REACTION to the poison. This is very much the same as what Ivermectin provides for COVID.
There is also this:
Maybe this idiot from the DailyMail article should find a new line of work...
“people are getting sick because they’re taking high-strength version intended for large animals”
Back to the lies. There is no ‘high strength version’ of Ivermectin. The ‘strength’ of it is how many milligrams on ingests, not how big the jar is (or tube, in this case). After all, are 500 milligram Tylenols any ‘stronger’ in a large bottle than a small bottle?
So it seems to me that our government could, maybe, help people get the dosage right, so if they do take the drug, which is NOT harmful in proper amounts, they don’t get sick.
Ivermectin has been approved for human use for decades.
Same with the mother of a close friend of mine. While in ICU, was given Ivermectin, and was released the next day.
They are ramping up the War on Ivermection.
A guy who works for McGill....
Nuff said.
Then please give what would be the proper safe dosage for humans!
Belief and hope are the power duo of placebo effect and not to be discounted.
People who want a prescription for it should be given one, it’s cheap and does no harm in the correct form and dosage.
Then we wouldn’t have these math illiterate poisonings.
FUFDA
Useful links.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/ivermectin/
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/
https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/
>>Geary, who is the Research Chair in Parasite Biotechnology at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, says that the study which spawned much of the ivermectin-craze is not being correctly read.
There is no “the study”, one study, involves. See the IVM meta URL in my prior post.
Not a sheep either...
Indeed. It doesn't treat COVID in the USA but it treats COVID in Africa and India. Can't stop that vaccine money train.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.