WHy is a judge even involved in this?
Because the FDA has overstepped its boundaries and broken the law by blocking existing treatments so the terminator "vaccine" manufacturers can have a monopoly.
It was very clear why the judge intervened / got “involved in this”.
Ivermectin was prescribed by the patients MD(who was likely not hospital staff). The hospital refused to administer the Ivermectin.
As is generally the case, a lawsuit was filed by the patients wife on behalf of her spouse. The relief requested was that the hospital administer the ivermectin. The judge granted the relief requested - eg, administer the drugs prescribed by the patients physician.
The judge did the right thing here in granting relief.
This is how the legal system is designed to work in the USA (mostly).
Because the wife is trying to help her husband recover and the hospital won't even let them try this remedy.
CDC warns he could get diarrhea if overdosed with Ivermectin......but he is 19 days on the ventilator already.
Do you really think the CDC should be warning that a patient could get diarrhea if overdosed with Ivermectin, at this point of his struggle with life and death?
Because the wife and doctor asked for treatment that the hospital refused. What would you have done?