Good thing we're stubborn
Posted on 08/29/2021 8:38:32 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
If you recall early on before the jabs were "released" under EUA I pointed out that some of the early study work had odd results that I could not reasonably explain a purpose to, and they bothered me a lot.
One of the most-glaring was the wildly higher antibody titers produced by them as opposed to natural infection. I mused at the time that this could easily be explained by the truncation (or simply ignorance of) the usual dose-ranging studies that are done on all drugs; those require time, of course, and when you're after Warp Speed time is something you don't have.
But now it appears that Pfizer may have known there was a problem -- they may not have known how serious it was, but they may well have known it existed and may have deliberately set the dosing to try to hide it.
And, as it turns out, that wasn't the only problem.
In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40% each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than 5% per month. Six months after BNT162b2 vaccination 16.1% subjects had antibody levels below the seropositivity threshold of <50 AU/mL, while only 10.8% of convalescent patients were below <50 AU/mL threshold after 9 months from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
In other words the dosing they used, and the original titers, concealed the decay below effective levels which was not being tested for but would have shown up in infections among vaccinated people had the original level been lower.
That's bad; the question now becomes did Pfizer know this and do it deliberately, and if not, what is the logical explanation for the dosing used? Why not set dosing roughly identical to natural infection? Simple: If they did that before the four months of the study ran a crap-ton of people would have gotten infected since the antibody titer would have worn off.
It gets worse:
In our study, we show that following vaccination, the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies decrease rapidly, indicating that BMPCs may not be created adequately and therefore anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity might be transient (Ibarrondo et al., 2020; Seow et al., 2020).
If there is little or no B-cell recall then the vaccine is a failure as it cannot stimulate durable immunity at all. That is, the jabs are basically the same (via a different mechanism) to receiving monoclonal antibodies if you get infected; yes, you have an antibody titer but the jabs fail to train your immune system to recognize the infection in the future. As that titer wanes the protection becomes increasingly worthless and, since we know mutational binding changes are occurring the potential for vaccine-caused harm by potentiating infections remains a distinct possibility as that occurs.
In addition, and perhaps most-damning of all, we also know that the vaccines have a very high significant adverse event rate -- much, much higher than any other commonly-used vaccine (such as MMR, varicella or the flu shot.) The really awful part of this is that most of the serious adverse events happened after the second jab, not the first one, implying that there is an accelerating risk with each successive injection. Whether that accelerating risk "bleeds off" over the next six months or so is a complete unknown since it was never tested for, but if it does not then attempting to buy successive six month periods of protection will, inevitably in everyone, cross over into being more likely to harm you than the virus itself and might even cross over to the point of inevitable harm or death if repeated enough times.
Any of this, standing alone, if identified before release would have almost-certainly caused these jabs to be scrapped. But that's not what happened and now we have the FDA that has actually passed on "licensing" the very same one that is the subject of this study.
Folks, I believe in vaccination on a general basis. I never believe in truncating the scientific work necessary to prove that something is both safe and effective when you cannot take it back, as is the case here. We have shoved needles in 200 million American arms and countless more throughout the world without having that evidence and now, as this study demonstrates, the dosing may have been set where it was on purpose to conceal what the manufacturers knew was declining effectiveness and a likely failure of the original immune stimulation to produce a response that had the capacity to be durable.
Never mind the safety issues raised by repeated "boosters" when we already know the risks of serious adverse events are potentially compounding rather than one-shot or linear risks.
This demands immediate investigation and, if it is found that the dosing was set intentionally with knowledge of the decay dynamics everyone involved in that and its concealment had better hang for it -- for starters. That is not a mistake, it is active fraud.
In addition figuring out how we back out of what is increasingly looking to be a nightmare scenario on our doorstep had better be determined -- and fast.
This much is certain: Given the data on the table at this point in time no part of the "answer" can be more shots in arms.
No matter what you believe about "Warp Speed" I will say this again: You better figure out how to deal with an infection when, not if, you get it, because on this data you are going to get Covid-19 if you have not already had it. Chicken soup is not the correct answer. If you rely on said chicken soup you may well wind up flat on your back with a tube down your throat as you gasp your last.
But everyone in Israel must get a 3rd shot to be fully vaxed
Since one cannot get boosters 3 times a year due to side effects, the protection will only last this year.
—
Which is likely the whole point - after all Pfizer stands to make billions and so do the other companies. Won’t do to have some drug that prevents things like they used to make ; just not profitable.
something I want explained by a Md.
—
You do not want an MD who only know what the literature says, you want a viral immunologist
I do all my own thinking. I like my doctor, but he is not a replacement for my brain.
Thank you
And it does sound serious,
But money and control override eveything
Good thing we're stubborn
In addition to TTFX’s comment, it also means that not only is there no ‘memory’ conferred to a subject’s immune system, that subsequently required ‘boosters’ may compound harm with each shot (ever more prevalent risk of injury or death)...
...all with the knowledge of Pfizer et al.
I use the term ‘subject’ intentionally: Nuremberg comes to mind much more frequently these days...
...yet Fauci’s new push for jabs in CHILDREN continues unabated...the ONE demographic almost entirely unaffected by this virus.
Heinous, criminal...pick your term. I never believed that I’d live to see such a scenario.
Thank you so much for the ping.
Feeling ever more vindicated by the day, but also feeling kind of helpless in regards to others (especially children), save for becoming likewise more activist by the day.
YW.
Yes, agree completely, about the children.
Just horrid and evil that they’re even considering giving these risky/dangerous shots to the innocent kids, who have no say, whatsoever.
The worst part of it are all the ignorant, useful idiots who point to news headlines of children being hospitalized and say, “See?”
I confronted one such useful idiot at my workplace last week after being asked, “What about you?” in regards to the fake ‘vaccines’, whereas she was asserting that children must also get the jabs.
It was a very brief conversation terminated by her walking away, my only regret being that I forgot at the time the name of the virus now aggressively and unseasonally infecting the kiddos:
RSV
It’s now burned in my memory.
“The use of the word “titer” made my face turn red.”
Would the plural of titer be titers?
Thank you for the English translation!
“...go to a wuhan coronavirus party.”
An enterprising funeral parlor would be throwing Wuhan parties on a regular basis. They’re bound to dig up some new clients.
“Dig up” may be the wrong term, but you get my drift.
So Israel believes the vaccine doesn’t work - even while pushing a third shot on virtually everyone?
Bottom line for me: The overwhelming number of people currently DYING from COVID are unvaccinated!
“ What would an MD know about it?”
———————————————————————-
Well, golly gee………bet a Doctor would know than a businessman/Political Activist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Denninger
Just sayin’.
I think it is hooters.
Furthermore, along with the decline in effectiveness of 'the jab', and thus requiring more subsequent 'jabs' for protection from the virus,
thus the government will find expenses increasing, and a more frequent need for the 'jab'.
In other words, the 'jab' actually results in an increasing dependence of additional 'jabs' for masking the symptom control, and has no direct effect on controlling the virus.
Secondly, what remains unknown is the effect that 'the jab' has natural immunity, or for how long.
To ignore natural immunity, or even having recovered from covid and still having to take additional "booster shots", is a denial of science.
Why?
Here's what you don't understand. First of all, you are trained by society, like most, to worship and trust 'doctors' as if they were the witch doctors of the village. This is a tale as old as time.
You have been taught that the witch doctors possess secret knowledge that no mere mortal could possibly understand. They can say or do anything and you blink like Gomer Pyle nod your head, and say 'yes doctor'.
*side note*
I make it a point to call my heart doctor 'Javet' (his last name, which is really Javed haha). I could tell it bothered him at first, but now he's used to it. You got to train these people that THEY work for YOU. And that they ain't gods.
*back on point*
Doctors themselves are just people like you and me. They got their book larnin' and experience, yes. But they are susceptible to human foibles. Look right here on FreeRepublic.com for some examples. I have been studying gas_dr and MomMd.
They both are very proud. They both (allegedly) have doctor education and training. And they both disregard and ridicule people with far more education, training, and experience than they have. They shut themselves off from certain new schools of thought and information. They ignore new facts.
People like this 'political activist' do not. They are open to new and emerging information, studies, and facts. And they use their brain to cipher it.
So to wrap this up in a bow and circle back, Doctors do not necessarily know more about this covid/vax hoax than any smart person that cares to delve into it deeply.
I wish you and people like you could understand human behavior a little more. Then we wouldn't have to argue day and night. Listen to Uncle Bagster once in a while, you Detroit male nurse. I'm trying to make you a better man.
You have been taught that the witch doctors possess secret knowledge that no mere mortal could possibly understand. They can say or do anything and you blink like Gomer Pyle nod your head, and say ‘yes doctor’.
Thankfully, that can be changed. If you want to evalute the idea behind a treatment, and you’re not in a hurry, you can read the research reports and publications that argue for it.
They’re written in a way that can be understood. If some part is not understood, one can find more information, spend a little more time and understand it. This can be done on a lot of topics. Some are more difficult.
Which is what we are seeing take place on a massive scale right now, world wide and right here on FreeRepublic.com.
The witch doctor worshippers don't much like it.
#AFreePeople
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.