Posted on 08/29/2021 5:05:53 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The bait n’ switch is on with the so-called Pfizer “vaccines.” The ones that are currently being offered are NOT the ones that the FDA approved last week. Eventually the approved shots will go into production and be available, but many governments and businesses are not waiting around before mandating their employees and customers get vaxxed.
There has been speculation that “Comirnaty,” the new injections to be offered by Pfizer once they get immunity from liability to distribute them, will not be the same as the current Pfizer jabs. This is based on both odd wording in the FDA’s approval letter and patents filed by Pfizer. So even though it’s possible that the currently circulated Pfizer shots will be the same as the ones that are receiving FDA approval, it’s just as likely that we will see a different version once Comirnaty is released.
The mandates that are popping up today are premature. They are still requiring people to take experimental drugs that have not been FDA-approved, drugs that are still being distributed under a renewed Emergency Use Authorization.
For many of us, it doesn’t matter how they label it or who “approved” it. The mRNA technology used to create spike proteins in bodies of the injected have been demonstrably dangerous in all iterations. Moderna’s “vaccine,” which is statistically more effective than the Pfizer shots, also appears to have heightened risks. As for the J&J shots and others that inject spike proteins directly into the bodies, the risks are nearly as high as their mRNA cousins.
Below is an article by Paul Craig Roberts describing the current situation. I’ll follow that up with my biggest concerns regarding an ignorant populace.
The Approved Pfizer Vaccine Is Not yet Available The Covid Vaccine profiteers are claiming that now the vaccine is officially...
(Excerpt) Read more at truthbasedmedia.com ...
Formulaically they SHOULD be the same.
However…
The brand name version is the one you can sue Pfizer for adverse reactions for - the other is still under EUA law.
Israel Cracks The Code: Jabs Don’t Work
If you recall early on before the jabs were “released” under EUA I pointed out that some of the early study work had odd results that I could not reasonably explain a purpose to, and they bothered me a lot.
One of the most-glaring was the wildly higher antibody titers produced by them as opposed to natural infection. I mused at the time that this could easily be explained by the truncation (or simply ignorance of) the usual dose-ranging studies that are done on all drugs; those require time, of course, and when you’re after Warp Speed time is something you don’t have.
But now it appears that Pfizer may have known there was a problem — they may not have known how serious it was, but they may well have known it existed and may have deliberately set the dosing to try to hide it.
And, as it turns out, that wasn’t the only problem.
In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40% each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than 5% per month. Six months after BNT162b2 vaccination 16.1% subjects had antibody levels below the seropositivity threshold of <50 AU/mL, while only 10.8% of convalescent patients were below <50 AU/mL threshold after 9 months from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
In other words the dosing they used, and the original titers, concealed the decay below effective levels which was not being tested for but would have shown up in infections among vaccinated people had the original level been lower.
That’s bad; the question now becomes did Pfizer know this and do it deliberately, and if not, what is the logical explanation for the dosing used? Why not set dosing roughly identical to natural infection? Simple: If they did that before the four months of the study ran a crap-ton of people would have gotten infected since the antibody titer would have worn off.
It gets worse:
In our study, we show that following vaccination, the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies decrease rapidly, indicating that BMPCs may not be created adequately and therefore anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity might be transient (Ibarrondo et al., 2020; Seow et al., 2020).
If there is little or no B-cell recall then the vaccine is a failure as it cannot stimulate durable immunity at all. That is, the jabs are basically the same (via a different mechanism) to receiving monoclonal antibodies if you get infected; yes, you have an antibody titer but the jabs fail to train your immune system to recognize the infection in the future. As that titer wanes the protection becomes increasingly worthless and, since we know mutational binding changes are occurring the potential for vaccine-caused harm by potentiating infections remains a distinct possibility as that occurs.
In addition, and perhaps most-damning of all, we also know that the vaccines have a very high significant adverse event rate — much, much higher than any other commonly-used vaccine (such as MMR, varicella or the flu shot.) The really awful part of this is that most of the serious adverse events happened after the second jab, not the first one, implying that there is an accelerating risk with each successive injection. Whether that accelerating risk “bleeds off” over the next six months or so is a complete unknown since it was never tested for, but if it does not then attempting to buy successive six month periods of protection will, inevitably in everyone, cross over into being more likely to harm you than the virus itself and might even cross over to the point of inevitable harm or death if repeated enough times.
Any of this, standing alone, if identified before release would have almost-certainly caused these jabs to be scrapped. But that’s not what happened and now we have the FDA that has actually passed on “licensing” the very same one that is the subject of this study.
Folks, I believe in vaccination on a general basis. I never believe in truncating the scientific work necessary to prove that something is both safe and effective when you cannot take it back, as is the case here. We have shoved needles in 200 million American arms and countless more throughout the world without having that evidence and now, as this study demonstrates, the dosing may have been set where it was on purpose to conceal what the manufacturers knew was declining effectiveness and a likely failure of the original immune stimulation to produce a response that had the capacity to be durable.
Never mind the safety issues raised by repeated “boosters” when we already know the risks of serious adverse events are potentially compounding rather than one-shot or linear risks.
This demands immediate investigation and, if it is found that the dosing was set intentionally with knowledge of the decay dynamics everyone involved in that and its concealment had better hang for it — for starters. That is not a mistake, it is active fraud.
In addition figuring out how we back out of what is increasingly looking to be a nightmare scenario on our doorstep had better be determined — and fast.
This much is certain: Given the data on the table at this point in time no part of the “answer” can be more shots in arms.
No matter what you believe about “Warp Speed” I will say this again: You better figure out how to deal with an infection when, not if, you get it, because on this data you are going to get Covid-19 if you have not already had it. Chicken soup is not the correct answer. If you rely on said chicken soup you may well wind up flat on your back with a tube down your throat as you gasp your last.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243400
The one that has a name like Comirnty, is the approved poison.
You are incorrect on both counts.
The two “vaccines” can be used interchangeably and they possess indemnification after approval. One can only sue the government, not Pfizer.
Eager to sell their old stock and probably have immunity from lawsuits.
That is what information warfare is meant to accomplish. The members of the leftist, democrat taliban party hate you folks and that includes all of the voters as well.
My wife and I, both in our sixties, had COVID-1984 in January/February of 2020 before it had a name and survived it without doctor visits or drugs, and I have the IgG and IgM antibodies to prove it.
Luckily, we were too dumb to run to a hospital so they could hook us up to ventilators and kill us.
It was the worst flu of our lives in terms of crap in our lungs, and it took months to cough it all up, which is key.
You have to cough until you are worn out, but you have to get your lungs clear.
Hooking somebody up to a ventilator prevents coughing and the crap continues to accumulate in their lungs until they die.
It’s as if they want to kill people.
Stay away from hospitals if you get it and want to live.
People’s Ignorance is why America is where it’s at.
2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==
See chart of the 4 “vaccines” & what is EUA, what is ‘approved’:
https://betterpathology.com/?p=990
>> Mandates Are Preying on People’s Ignorance
Predators
They’re not TWO vaccines. They’re the SAME except for possible manufacturing differences.
The difference, as I pointed out, are purely LEGAL ones.
And even then it’s not the same... right? It’s basically a set system of payouts.
Let’s all remember that President Trump worked hard to get prescription prices cut.
I wouldn’t have thought it even two years ago, but the billions in revenue from these vaccines, and their proposed boosters, could be a sneaky way for the pharmeceutical companies to recoup those profits, and flip the bird at Trump.
Seems unbelievable, I know. But nothing’s unbelievable anymore.
I had it. No cough. A friend busted a rib from coughing from COVID and his wife’s lungs scarred.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”
Correct. See above I posted the actual FDA link to the document and the relevant footnote.
What’s not clear is they don’t specifically say what the legal differences are.
PREP act immunity does not depend on FDA approval.
Read the PREP act and the PREP act declaration
“Covered Persons who are afforded liability immunity under this Declaration are “manufacturers,” “distributors,” “program planners,” “qualified persons,” and their officials, agents, and employees, as those terms are defined in the PREP Act, and the United States. “
“A qualified pandemic or epidemic product means a drug or device, as defined in the FD&C Act or a biological product, as defined in the PHS Act that is (i) manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic or limit the harm such a pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause; (ii) manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by such a drug, biological product, or device; (iii) or a product or technology intended to enhance the use or effect of such a drug, biological product, or device.”
“To be a Covered Countermeasure, qualified pandemic or epidemic products or security countermeasures also must be approved or cleared under the FD&C Act; licensed under the PHS Act; or authorized for emergency use under Sections 564, 564A, or 564B of the FD&C Act.”
It’s as clear as can be. Covered Countermeasures include:
FDA Approved products.
OR
Licensed Products
OR
EUA Products.
Comorbidity?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.