Posted on 08/29/2021 12:15:47 PM PDT by be-baw
I think if you’re exposed to the virus at work, or living in an area, eg GA and other states with low vaccinations I’d; recommend the vaccine.
OTOH, I’m not so eager to take a booster less than one year from taking the vaccine.
Not all vaccines are 100% effective, so you’re going to get people vaccinated who get the virus, but the illness should be milder.
In summary, if you’re staying home, rarely going out, then fine, don’t take the vaccine. If you’re in public, you will sooner or later get the virus if you’re not vaccinated.
I agree. COVID infection and death statistics should also be ignored — for the same reason.
be-baw wrote: “VAERS is essentially useless and its data should be ignored.”
Except for those who want to ignore the difference between causation and correlation.
From the article: “To see the vaccine as riskier than the virus itself is like people who refuse to wear a seatbelt “because they heard of someone who drowned in a car accident because they couldn’t get their seatbelt off,” Zaroukian said. “You can always come up with a story about the rare exception of where doing something that should keep you safe was in this instance less safe.””
The anti-vaxxers are just like those refusing to wear a seatbelt. You can always find some obscure excuse/reason for not doing something you do not want to do.
So... will he be punished for discussing misinformation here? Because when doctors talked about their success with ivermectin last year they were silenced and condemned because their “anectodal evidence” wasn’t “scientific”.
Now watch out, here comes pro-vaxx doctor - but he touts the government line so we should all listen to him because he’s a “good” doctor.
BS.
This article seems like apples to oranges to me. Yes people die with covid. What are their preexisting conditions? Does it compare to the first wave before the vaccinations? And as usual everything leaves out how many natural recoveries are reinfected?.
Why should I get multiple shots for an illness I have a 99.8% chance of recovering from?
nikos1121 wrote: “Not all vaccines are 100% effective, so you’re going to get people vaccinated who get the virus, but the illness should be milder.”
Can you name two or three vaccines that are 100% effective?
Then why post it?
[[Because when doctors talked about their success with ivermectin last year they were silenced and condemned because their “anectodal evidence” wasn’t “scientific”.]]
And now they are threatened with possibly having their licensees revoked too if the left get their way-
Not 100%, are you shitting me?
The vaccine is around 39% with respect to the Delta variant.
See Israel and England, and probably us this Fall/Winter.
Oh great one, please present us with the long term studies on mRNA gene therapy.
Do you think I should not have posted it? If not, why not.
Imagine a giant jar of one billion M&Ms and the government insists that every man, woman and child in the US needs to reach inside and eat 2 of them but .05% (500,000) of the M&Ms are laced with a fatal amount of cyanide, would you still be willing even eat just one? How about 2? Or 3? Or continue to eat one every 6 months if the government insists it’s necessary for the common good and welfare of the nation?
The “vaccine” is NOT against the virus genome... it is against a small segment of the mRNA which encodes for a portion (not all of it) of the protein of the S-Protein (the spike proteins on the OUTSIDE of the virion (the container surrounding the full virus genetic component). And all of these are the original Covid-19 small clip of the mRNA of the S-protein.
NOT for ANY variant mutation of the S-Protein (mutations Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and now Delta... and soon Lambda).
So, these are NOT true vaccines both for the reason they are not against the entire protein sequence, but also, more importantly-— the full virus can be stored in what are called “animal reservoirs” and thus cannot be eliminated from the world.
Smallpox has no animal reservoir, and so— the vaccine in this regard is a true preventive vaccine. Polio virus is another one. These are the only true vaccines.
Constantly changing to a “booster” to accommodate an ever mutating S-Protein.... is futile. And aside from that— quite profitable to misrepresent the need.
EE, wait a little bit and you’ll hear the crickets chirping.
Because right after you posted it, you said this: “VAERS is essentially useless and its data should be ignored.” So you ignore it by posting it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.