Posted on 08/27/2021 10:40:05 AM PDT by Qiviut
The vaccine landscape became more complicated this week after FDA’s approval of COMIRNATY, the vaccine manufactured by Pfizer Inc. of New York for BioNTech Manufacturing of Mainz, Germany. I’ve prepared this chart to aid understanding of what’s approved, what’s authorized by EUA, and what’s neither approved nor authorized. I’ve also included the major warnings listed on the factsheets or prescribing information for each vaccine. A “No” in this section doesn’t necessarily mean that the complication cannot happen, since all authorized vaccines include the warning of other risks that are not listed.
An FDA approved vaccine is not available for injection as of this writing. We are learning that all these vaccines are “leaky.” Soon, I’ll post an article that breaks down what a leaky vaccine is and what that means for the pandemic.
Before anyone starts getting in a kerfluffle over the "no" answers on the chart regarding certain adverse reactions, please note the author did say this (emphasis mine):
"I’ve also included the major warnings listed on the factsheets or prescribing information for each vaccine. A “No” in this section doesn’t necessarily mean that the complication cannot happen, since all authorized vaccines include the warning of other risks that are not listed."
since I won’t jab period I have not followed this that closely but did they just approve vaporvax?
A vax that is not even available yet?
Thanks for posting a breath of reality on the vaccines.
Please ping me, when you post anything from this Doctor, Kevin Homer.
Thanks
*
Yup - the FDA “approved” vax is not currently available. What they are trying to do is use up all the EUA vax so they don’t lose money on it .... plus, they haven’t worked out the liability issues on the ‘approved’ vax yet .... they have total immunity on the EUA vax.
Anyone being mandated to take the jab ... if it’s not the new vax name COMIRNATY on the bottle, it’s EUA, experimental, & you can REFUSE for that reason.
Article with info:
2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
Excerpts:
EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.
At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.
When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from a generous retinue of liability protections.
But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.
And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.
Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.
Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.
The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.
Are you by chance on GETTR? I follow Dr. Homer there & it alerts me to his articles. I was never on ‘twit’, but GETTR is really good .... I’m very selective who I follow.
Janssen is the only one causing blood clots? That’s not right.
Bad chart. Those aren’t yes or no questions.
For example blood clots. The odds are 4 in a million on both Pfizer and Moderna and 15 in a million on Jansen.
Both should be technically be yes. The risk is small with all of them, but it has happened with all.
(Referring to severe initial blood clots as opposed to the Canadian doctor’s speculation of micro clots)
BTW, knew nothing about Dr. Homer until I heard him on Bannon’s War Room.
I’ll wait for Novavax and see how it performs a while before I consider that one. These four? Nope.
Before anyone starts getting in a kerfluffle over the "no" answers on the chart regarding certain adverse reactions, please note the author did say this (emphasis mine):
"I’ve also included the major warnings listed on the factsheets or prescribing information for each vaccine. A “No” in this section doesn’t necessarily mean that the complication cannot happen, since all authorized vaccines include the warning of other risks that are not listed."
He should have at least had an asterick and a footnote in the graph itself.
And it’s still a pretty arbitrary line he drew in saying Jansen did cause clots but Pfizer and Moderna do not.
What is EUA? European Union Approved?
Emergency Use Authorization
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.