Would you expect openness and clarity to suddenly appear amid the deception?
“Pfizer Seeking Full Indemnification”
[Dr. Robert Malone on War Room with Steve Bannon. 4 minute video]
Malone says that the new “Comernity” jab that is “FDA approved” is NOT the same as the currently available Pfizer vaxx jab.
“Comernity” is not yet available.
Pfizer and the FDA are playing a “3 card monty” fake switcheroo. They will not make the currently available Pfizer vaxx jab available without the existing extended EUA and full continuing immunity.
The as-yet unavailable “FDA Approved Comernity” at this point is just a fake out to trick the gullible into taking the same old EUA Pfizer vaxx jab.]
https://rumble.com/vlmd4g-pfizer-seeking-full-indemnification.html
that would explain why so many people have been confused about the approval.
in Australia, those who noted the name - Comirnaty - knew that it was on offer Down Under.
27 Aug: Australian Govt: Therapeutic Goods Association (TGA): COVID-19 vaccine: Pfizer Australia - COMIRNATY BNT162b2 (mRNA) - approved for use in individuals 12 years and older
On 22 July 2021 the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) granted provisional approval to Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd for its COVID-19 vaccine, COMIRNATY, in individuals aged 12 years and older.
This decision follows the provisional approval granted by the TGA to COMIRNATY on 25 January 2021 for used in individuals aged 16 years and older. Pfizer subsequently made an application to the TGA to vary the original approval to include children between 12 and 15 years of age...
Provisional approval of this vaccine is valid for two years and means it can now be legally supplied in Australia. The approval is subject to certain strict conditions, such as the requirement for Pfizer to continue providing information to the TGA on longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post-market assessment...
Australians can be confident that the TGA’s review process of this vaccine was rigorous and of the highest standard...
The provisional approval pathway provides a formal and transparent mechanism for speeding up the registration of promising new medicines with preliminary clinical data...
https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-vaccine-pfizer-australia-comirnaty-bnt162b2-mrna-approved-use-individuals-12-years-and-older
it’s shocking how many Australians believe the TGA independently assesses these vaccines, when they do nothing of the sort.
there is, at present, some concern building about the push to vaccinate 12-15 year olds.
Thanks for posting this. I have been trying to understand this since the ‘approval’ came out... This is the best explanation I have seen yet, in layman’s terms.
There is some fine print that's oddly worded but that could just be a matter of being written by a young flunky
Bookmark.
Gee, I wonder what entities Pfizer donates to politically?…
Oh, yeah… they’re big donors to Plugs Biden, the DNC AND the RNC.
No WONDER it is THEIR “vaccine” that got FDA approval…
Yeah..sure.. looks legit to me!
They approved the unavailable vax version because if it were available (and effective) all other vaxes under the emergency approval would be instantly illegal.
Pharm cannot have that.
And, that is the precise reason all of the other treatments were demonized when mentioned (e.g. Iverwhatever, HydroIdon’tcare, Zn, etc). Had any doctor been allowed to show that they were effective all of the fake vaccines would be illegal.
Pharm cannot have that.
I’ve been reading the PREP Act and it’s subsequent amendments.
Especially the particularly infuriating bits about liability coverage being only available for “covered countermeasures”.
That frickin’ explains a lot.
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.
The drug is APPROVED! PERIOD!
“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine”
THEY ARE THE SAME! It is just a “LEGAL” distinction.
The formulation has been approved!
FDA:
“8 The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”
They can’t be sued over the EUA-authorized vaccine, but they can be sued over the Comirnaty Covid vaccine.
The Comirnaty Covid vaccine doesn’t have the legal protections that the EUA-authorized vaccine has, but the “drug” itself is the SAME drug.
Also the Comirnaty Covid vaccine has to jump through all the usual hoops (and public protections) that other approved vaccines have to jump through.
In other words, the Comirnaty Covid vaccine will be FULLY regulated, the EUA-authorized vaccine was/is not.
That doesn’t change the FACT that the two vaccines are THE SAME DRUG and are APPROVED.
I love The American Thinker, but they are just WRONG on this.
See above.
I believe it was Ali that called it “Rope-A-Dope”.