Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueMondaySkipper
Search is my friend?

Actually, a global map is my first friend on this subject.

Every country that claims remarkable success with Ivermectin is in a tropical latitude.

Climate and parasites absolutely have a significant impact on COVID death and infection rates.

In addition, the USA and northern Europe set the gold standard for medical research.

Every year, several medical audit organizations rank countries for fraudulent or un-replicable medical research.

India and Mexico have a terrible record.

Japan is always near the bottom of the group of advanced wealthy countries.

If you or any other American wants to preemptively take Ivermectin, I have no problem with that.

I will wait to read about it in Nature or The Lancet, first.

57 posted on 08/27/2021 10:40:37 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen; Candor7

What you need to ask is, did your government sign this agreement:

https://www.wionews.com/world/how-pfizer-tried-to-bully-argentina-and-brazil-in-exchange-for-vaccines-366037

Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that (i) Pfizer’s efforts to develop and manufacture the Product are aspirational in nature and subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and (ii) the fact that any other drug or vaccine to prevent, treat or cure COVID-19 infection is successfully developed or granted authorization earlier than the granting of Authorization for the Product shall not change the current situation of urgent needs for prevention of the spread of the COVID-19 infection that poses serious threats to and harmful effects on the lives and health of the general public.”

2.1b http://ti-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Albania-Pfizer.pdf

Your so-called USA and Northern Europe gold standard for medical research has absolutely nothing to do with the EU authorisation for the experimental treatment under discussion, whereas Ivermectin has been successfully prescribed for a variety of needs for several decades.


60 posted on 08/27/2021 4:53:31 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

“ Climate and parasites absolutely have a significant impact on COVID death and infection rates.”

Proof please. I suspect you are making this up. Let’s see tour Lancet studies proving this statement. I want causation, not simple correlation. Not just a single study either, I want several, you know, like how ivermectin has many.

“In addition, the USA and northern Europe set the gold standard for medical research.”

And there is absolutely no science fraud in the US or Europe, right? Everything above board and the wild sums of money being thrown around would never EVER sway “scientists”. Just like global warming, err climate change. It’s all as honest as the day is long. Scientists never have an agenda and would never follow the money. Got it.

“India and Mexico have a terrible record.”

Yet, as they were spiking in cases and hospitalizations they went with Ivermectin and the cases dropped precipitously. Coincidence I’m sure. Check with CNN to be sure.
.

“If you or any other American wants to preemptively take Ivermectin, I have no problem with that.”

Yet here you are poo-pooing ivermectin.

“I will wait to read about it in Nature or The Lancet, first.”

Did you miss where the Lancer did exactly that? The cabal forced them to retract but they did post it. Is the Lancet miraculously immune to outside pressure?

Face it, you have a tendency to trust groups that have proven to be compromised and untrustworthy. It seems moronic and dangerous, but you do you,


61 posted on 08/28/2021 5:10:27 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Since you claim to read things, here is something to dig into.

https://ivmmeta.com/


62 posted on 08/28/2021 5:17:05 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen

Although I don’t expect you to open your mind even a little bit, I ran across this and immediately thought of you, and your misplaced infatuation with the Lancet. Now you can continue to trust the untrustworthy, but you might want to stop trying to convince the rest of us to be as foolish as you choose to be.

Turns out, they are not to be trusted. Infiltrated by the Chinese and doing their bidding. But hey, nothing to see here, right? SMH

https://www.opindia.com/2021/09/26-of-27-scientists-that-dismissed-covid-19-lab-leak-theory-linked-to-wuhan-lab/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+OpIndia+%28OpIndia%29


66 posted on 09/11/2021 9:12:24 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson