Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen

Since you claim to read things, here is something to dig into.

https://ivmmeta.com/


62 posted on 08/28/2021 5:17:05 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: BlueMondaySkipper
My mistake, Skipper.

I failed to check your post history for prior Q-Commitments.

I see the same pattern again and again on different political issues - above average intelligence mixed with a single minded devotion that borders on mental illness.

You have deliberately misstated my comments about COVID in the tropics.

It is obvious that the COVID death toll in warmer climates is lower than it is in mild or cool climates.

The countries involved are often very poor, and many millions of the residents already use Ivermectin because of the ever present threat of parasites.

Do you really need to read a peer reviewed medical study to know that people with parasites have worse COVID outcomes than people who do not have parasites?

The flaws in your pages and pages of Ivermectin studies should be obvious.

Heterogeneous test groups being compared to heterogeneous placebo groups.

Very low national vaccination rates.

Significant variations in Ivermectin dosage.

Dozens and dozens of Ivermectin studies combined into meta-analyses that do not have a clearly stated methodology.

So, right back where we started.

Ivermectin is a great idea. I wish I could trust the data.

63 posted on 08/28/2021 7:32:00 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson