Skip to comments.
Bakuage Offers Prize of 120 Million JPY to Whoever Solves Collatz Conjecture, Math Problem Unsolved for 84 Years
prnewswire. com ^
| 7/7/2021
| Staff
Posted on 08/26/2021 4:17:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
No one has a clue how to solve it. It might as well be you! A mathematical background is not really required. Anyone could be the person who dreams up the trick to solve it and walks away a millionaire.
To: LibWhacker
Run the problem by me again...?
2
posted on
08/26/2021 4:20:06 PM PDT
by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: LibWhacker
42.
Please send prize to...(Jim knows my bank account)
TIA
3
posted on
08/26/2021 4:24:43 PM PDT
by
TangoLimaSierra
(⭐⭐To the left, truth is right-wing extremism.⭐⭐)
To: Jim W N
To: Jim W N
It makes no sense. It’s like someone didn’t explain the whole procedure.
Anyone can take an even number and divide by 2 or an odd number and divide by 3 and add 1.
So then what?
5
posted on
08/26/2021 4:27:24 PM PDT
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
To: LibWhacker
I suspect that someone untrained in mathematics might possibly have some insight to offer. The field of Number Theory is accessible, and yet chock full of interesting but unproven conjectures, such as the famous
Goldbach's conjecture.
6
posted on
08/26/2021 4:28:08 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: metmom
Here, this should clarify it:
7
posted on
08/26/2021 4:30:06 PM PDT
by
Teflonic
(tt)
To: metmom
It’s an algorithm that you repeatedly apply.
If the number is even then divide by 2
else if the number is odd then multiply by 3 and add 1
Repeat until the number is 1
The conjecture is that this will always result in 1 eventually, but it has not been explained why or if that is actually true.
To: Teflonic
9
posted on
08/26/2021 4:38:20 PM PDT
by
Nuc 1.1
(Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: Governor Dinwiddie
I just watched a youtube where some guy was late to his college math class, copied the problems on the board, thinking they vwere homework, spent several days solving them, turned the answers in, then the professor revealed he had solved two problems like this one. He said if he had known they were unsolvable (stated at beginning of class he missed) , he probably would have had a mental block and not solved them.
To: LibWhacker
I had that math problem completely solved. But Global Warming set my proof on fire. Perhaps Greta Thunberg can get me a consolation award. Half the prize will do.
11
posted on
08/26/2021 4:39:17 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have alrseady previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: LibWhacker
12
posted on
08/26/2021 4:40:53 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(Sophisticated so public policy is not applicable. )
To: Teflonic
Maybe it turns into a moebius strip somewhere?
13
posted on
08/26/2021 4:43:23 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
To: LibWhacker
Times 3 + 1 will eventually deliver an even number. From there, divide by two repeatedly until you get to 1.
14
posted on
08/26/2021 4:43:57 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: metmom
example: pick a number, like 42
42 / 2 = 21
21 * 3 + 1 = 64
64 / 2 = 32
/ 2 = 16
/ 2 = 8
/ 2 = 4
/ 2 = 2
/ 2 = 1
It says, whatever number you pick, you will arrive at 1
To: LibWhacker
16
posted on
08/26/2021 4:52:57 PM PDT
by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
To: LibWhacker
17
posted on
08/26/2021 4:53:15 PM PDT
by
algore
( )
To: Dan Cooper
Thanks for that explanation!
But I still don’t get what the issue is here.
You will always end up at 1 because of math, and it is true because it’s math.
I not sure I even understand what I just said...
To: 1FreeAmerican
The problem is that the numbers can go up and go down.
To prove that the conjecture is not true is to find a number that as you do the sequence, the sequence return to the original number. That would be an infinite loop, as it would never go to zero, but constantly repeat the pattern. In addition, every number in this sequence would not lead to 1.
To: algore
Hmm, wonder if it’s flawed? Why would a million dollar reward be announced last month when Sultan published his “proof” in 2017?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson