Posted on 08/24/2021 12:53:48 AM PDT by ransomnote
I knew she was lying when I saw her speak. A scientist who says, "Data suggests..." is making a statement to which they have no intention of being held accountable. Video at link. Transcript of March versus August statements below.
Our data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick, and that it’s not just in the clinical trials, but it’s also in real world data. ~Rochelle Walensky
August 2021
Reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggest increased risk of severe disease among those vaccinated early.
Given this body of evidence, we are concerned that the current strong protection against severe infection, hospitalization and death could decrease in the months ahead, especially among those who are at higher risk, or who were vaccinated earlier during the phases of our vaccination rollout. ~Rochelle Walensky
Is this a scam to get people to line up for the booster shots?
PING
just like the smokers....
IMO....no one thin dime....not one....
Is this a scam to get people to line up for the booster shots?
~~~~~~~~
I know it’s a scam but I can’t tell which way it’s pointing. Perhaps a multi-purpose scam.
She’s concealing terrible news - In August she starts off by saying that vaccinated people are MORE susceptible to becoming severely ill, according to international colleagues. The CDC has been hiding the evidence the same is happening in the US. The MSM is helping by lying.
Decent people would warn the public, but she makes it sound like it’s happening in Israel so let’s just be extra careful so it doesn’t happen here. BUT WAIT. Those people are made MORE vulnerable by ‘vaccination’ so why ‘vaccinate’ them again? Won’t that make them more vulnerable, again? She’s concealing information that has been blowing around the web for months.
So it’s partly to push boosters, but it conceals the fact that boosters could make people become sicker when infected than if they hadn’t had the shot(s).
Also, I don’t know what it means because the WHO just said they are going to hold off on booster shots for 2 months out of fairness to countries with low vaccination levels and avoid creating more variants. That statement is a mind blower - they are tacitly admitting their vaccination program helped create the variants! But again, pairing it with other information so we don’t notice.
This is just infuriating.
so now we have to pay for the stupidity of those rushing to get injected?.....
just like the smokers....
IMO....no one thin dime....not one....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some people with chronic illnesses were begged by their specialists to get the vaccine. What is a person to do when their doctor, whom they trust, begs them to get vaccinated? I’ve been hearing about family interventions (daughter crying, begging) and people really should be able to trust their own doctors.
“Data suggests” = “Data doesn’t completely contradict my preconceived notions”
Disgusting.
They just warned the early-vaccinated people have become more at risk of severe illness in Israel, and since humans are the same the world over, we can just accept this as a confession - it's been happening here in the US too. Many have been talking about it and all have been called liars.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus calls for pause on COVID vaccine booster rollout
abc.net.au ^Â | 8/23/2021 | Reuters: Denis Balibouse
Posted on 8/23/2021, 9:17:55 PM by Right Wing Vegan
The head of the World Health Organization has called for a two-month moratorium on administering COVID-19 vaccine booster shots.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus proposed the move as a means of reducing global vaccine inequality and preventing the emergence of new coronavirus variants.
Dr Tedros said that he was "really disappointed" with the scope of vaccine donations worldwide.
“Data suggests” = “Data doesn’t completely contradict my preconceived notions”
Disgusting
~~~~~~~~~~~
Besides, it was just a ‘suggestion’.
Fauci liked to say, “Early data suggests.....”
You know, like the first 1000 votes in a presidential election would be ‘early data’?
Fauci and Walensky both said, “We’re seeing data...” which is meaningless. We’re invited to prove that the didn’t see anything, ever?
We just assume when they looked away all that other horrible data came along.
No scientist talks like these shysters when advising a course of action. Scientists eagerly say, “Early data suggests we may have found something that works! But it will be another year before we know so it’s too soon to get anyone’s hopes up. The rest of the data could be bad. Stand by!”
But Fauci/Walensky say “Early data suggests....you should bet your life and that of your unborn children on a barely trialed ‘vaccine’ from technology that hasn’t worked in 30 years, and that I’m pushing you to take, as if I’m a used car salesman on commission!
Everyone the world over should be equally at risk of the deadly consequences of these deadly Gene manipulating injections.
Why shouldn’t the poor be at risk of blood clots, nerve damage and brain damage.
This rushed untested vaccine approval only puts more doubt on the vax.
It is clearly an order from the Biden admin to approve it, or else.
$$$$$= funding
all according to plan.
Teddy cracks me up. First he didn’t want black folks in the vaccines trials being ‘white men’s guinea pigs’ and now he’s whining black folks don’t have free vaccines fast enough (free as in their govts can’t or won’t pay for them because they’re all corrupt to the gills)
There’s no winning when you’re a westerner.
The question is this: if this all goes terribly south. If people start dying from these shots en masse, are those of us who stood firm prepared to fight back against the tyrants?
This is like watching a slow-moving train wreck.
Without a doubt.
Bump for later review.
Oh really, China doll?
But wait...there's more.
And still more....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.