[babble-on]

They can simply mandate vaccination and the people nervous about taking a vaccine that the FDA hasn’t blessed can get the Pfizer one. Should eliminate that objection entirely. And that would mean something if that objection hadn’t been a strawman in the first place, as we can see by the goalposts being moved by the anti-vax crowd.

[BusterDog]

CDC will say you are fully vaxed 8 months after J&J or 2nd Moderna then must have booster to be fully backed, Pfizer boost recommended for all, only boost fully approved.

[metmom]

You’re ignoring the people who have already been vaxxed with a different one.

What about them?

Do they now have to go get a Pfizer one on top of what they already have? Will they now be considered unvaxxed or will the company allow them to use the one they got even though it’s not technically approved by the FDA?

What are the repercussions of that?

[backwoods-engineer]

Goalposts being moved? If it’s ANYBODY that’s moving the goalposts, it’s the Covidian statists like YOU.

[Kevmo]

goalposts being moved by the anti-vax crowd.
***WTF? First of all, I aint anti-vax so kiss off with that straw characterization. I was very pro-vax, having contracted Whooping Cough as a child which easily could have been prevented if we’d been vaccinated.

But this thing aint a vaccine. Vaccines prevent contracting the disease, which gene therapy sequences can’t and don’t do. Vaccines also prevent spreading the disease, which these things don’t do. I’m a pro-vax anti-messengerRNA gene therapy experimental sequencer. If you inject horse manure into your veins and call it a vaccine, that doesn’t make it a vaccine.

Secondly, what is it with FORCING everyone to take a bullshiite horse manure experimental ‘vaccine’? My body my choice.

This episode in politics has drawn out the statists from the woodwork inside conservatism.

[just me]

NOT GETTING THE JAB!!!!

[Antoninus]

as we can see by the goalposts being moved by the anti-vax crowd.

I haven't seen any goal-post moving. The objections to the jab remain despite the FDA's rubber-stamp. The primary ones are that the jab:

1.) Wanes in effectiveness over time to the point where a untested booster is now called for at 6 months or less;
2.) Can cause serious harm or even death and has been shown to do so in numerous cases according to VAERS reporting;
3.) Doesn't actually prevent covid infection and transmission to the extent advertised;
4.) Has not gone through clinical trials to evaluate adverse data more than a year out, particularly in cases where three or even four shots are given in a one year period;
5.) May do more harm than good to someone who has already survived a covid infection.

None of these are strawmen, and none have been answered by the FDA.

[Manuel OKelley]

Question

IF it turns out a few years from now that the Pfizer vax is causing life threatening side effects in a measurable % of those who took it, would it even concern you that you pushed reluctant people into it? Or would you just say that was what “insert authority here” told us to do not my fault”