Approval of the Pfizer Vaccine causes more problems than it solves

Self ^ | 8/23/2021 | BRL

[BRL]

I work for a large corporation and I am quite certain that they are very strongly considering mandating the vaccination for all of the employees.

So Pfizer gets approved today. On the surface, that seems like a bad thing. However, as I think about it, how does the company use the approval of one vaccine to make a mandate for all of the employees. It seems to me if they mandate the vaccine then they must mandate the approved vaccine , but if they mandate the approved vaccine then two thirds of their workforce is working without the approved vaccine.

I think this can twist into a real cluster quickly for corporations that use the "approval" as the basis of justifying the vaccine mandate.

[AirForceVet1988]

No.

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

[Ceebass]

This episode in politics has drawn out the statists from the woodwork inside conservatism.....

This website is infested with trolls. Has been for some time.

[NoLibZone]

If it wasn’t written on stone by the finger of God, or into the Constitution, then it’s just a suggestion!

[roving]

My company says they won’t mandate. If they did, I would quit on the spot. They are having a hard enough time finding people to hire.

I did my own personal poll and asked others what they would do. So many would quit, my company would be forced to close their doors after being in business since the 40s

[Kevmo]

I see it. Statist GOPes, RINOs, fauxconservatives.

I have the solution on my home page. Do a search for ‘litmus’.

[roving]

These covid vaxxers were never conservatives. Their true colors have shining bright for all of FR to see

[Getready]

Pretty good. They just calculate broad numbers on unspecified populations. And calculate odds..

If a person lives in a bubble...with only sterilized items being let in...very low chance of infection...if one person is vaccinated, lives normally, gets covid...that would come out as 1/2 of the people get covid and only the vaccinated get it.

Remember, the average person has about 1 testicle and about 1 ovary.

[Kevmo]

Remember, the average person has about 1 testicle and about 1 ovary.
***Hmmm, Schroedinger’s Cat observation with averages.

[Antoninus]

as we can see by the goalposts being moved by the anti-vax crowd.

I haven't seen any goal-post moving. The objections to the jab remain despite the FDA's rubber-stamp. The primary ones are that the jab:

1.) Wanes in effectiveness over time to the point where a untested booster is now called for at 6 months or less;
2.) Can cause serious harm or even death and has been shown to do so in numerous cases according to VAERS reporting;
3.) Doesn't actually prevent covid infection and transmission to the extent advertised;
4.) Has not gone through clinical trials to evaluate adverse data more than a year out, particularly in cases where three or even four shots are given in a one year period;
5.) May do more harm than good to someone who has already survived a covid infection.

None of these are strawmen, and none have been answered by the FDA.

[sarge83]

And the boosters done with no testing or data, just a wild guess and a bad one at that because the first two injections faded so quickly.

So for the follow the science crowd I am forced to take the jab in perpetuity and become a drug addict for piss poor examples of so-called vaccines that leave me clamoring for the government and big pharma to SAVE me every 6-8 months with another shot of their witches brews from hell that couldn’t be tested on animals because in all previous tests the animals got ADE and died, what could go wrong here! So by being forced to join the following the science cult I get to join the borg collective as another dependent drone that the government owns down to their damned DNA.

[katie didit]

ditto.

[Getready]

But when I actually checked...the prediction collapsed....

[usconservative]

Correct. It's not an FDA approved vaccine, it simply received continued EUA.

This is being grossly mischaracterized by the lying liberal lamestream media as an "approved" vaccine. WRONG. (I'm not a lawyer, I didn't sleep at a Holiday Inn and I don't pretend to understand all the legalease in the document. I was however, unable to find any mention of fda approval in the document when I read it. So there's that.)

[zeugma]

// Well, it makes it harder for the nutcases to call it “experimental”, which I will miss because I know I can utterly ignore anything someone using that description posts. But I’m sure the Qtards will still have reasons for people not to take it.

You ignore anyone who correctly calls it an experimental drug? Brainwashed much?

[Kevmo]

Somehow Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle took over.

[Manuel OKelley]

Question

IF it turns out a few years from now that the Pfizer vax is causing life threatening side effects in a measurable % of those who took it, would it even concern you that you pushed reluctant people into it? Or would you just say that was what “insert authority here” told us to do not my fault”

[semimojo]

Went to page 12.

So this is in reality just a continuation of the EUA?!

Yes and no.

The EUA remains in place for the vaccine already produced and labeled under the EUA. They call this the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

The newly-licensed vaccine they refer to as COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA). It will be labeled that way and isn’t subject to the EUA restrictions - just the terms of the license - but it’s the same vaccine.

Look at the bottom of that page:

”COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is now licensed for individuals 16 years of age and older. There remains, however, a significant amount of Pfizer- BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that was manufactured and labeled in accordance with this emergency use authorization. This authorization thus remains in place with respect to that product for the previously-authorized indication and uses”

The letter is meant for lawyers, not us.

[semimojo]

Correct. It's not an FDA approved vaccine, it simply received continued EUA

See #57.

[Mashood]

6. Immunocompromised patitents were not used in the clinical trials for vaccine approval. There is no data to indicate the affect of mRNA on these vaccine candidates.

[ETCM]

RushisMyTeddyBear’s EUA link was not to the FDA approval. It was for 12-15 yr olds and vaccine manufactured and labeled prior to full FDA Approval. The FDA approval is here:

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download