Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alex Berenson on Twitter: It is awful news. Up to 15 Israelis who are a week out from the third dose have already died? 88 are very sick?
twitter.com ^ | Aug 22, 2021 | AlexBerenson

Posted on 08/22/2021 4:41:26 PM PDT by ransomnote

Alex Berenson
 
@AlexBerenson
 
1/ They will spin this as hard as possible, but it is awful news. Up to 15 Israelis who are a week out from the third dose have already died? 88 are very sick? Understand: A) The denominator here will be in person-DAYS - that’s how little time has passed since boosters started.
 
 
 
 
Alex Berenson
 
@AlexBerenson
·
34m
 
Replying to
2/ The third dose produces a 20x-40x peak of antibodies compared to the second dose. And post-second-dose protection peaks at 90-95% for a few weeks. (It doesn’t last.)These people should be in that window, with HIGHER titers. They should have ~full protection. Why don’t they?
 
 
Alex Berenson
 
@AlexBerenson
·
32m
 
3/ The bias in favor of vaccinating healthy older people who can tolerate shots that exists for the first two doses is probably even higher for the third. Again, this means the numbers are WORSE than they seem based on the topline ratios.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: berenson; breakthrough; chinavirus; covidobsession; deaths; fauxccine; hideunderyourbed; israel; mortality; qqqqq; qtard; quaxxccine; vaccine; vaxicide; zotthekeywordtroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Qiviut

“Biden Says......”

Do you believe him?


41 posted on 08/22/2021 6:05:37 PM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Nope your still wrong. Nowhere in the source is it patient days.

Read it again. Then let’s break it down together

“According to the data, just 0.2% of the first 1.1 million Israelis who got their booster dose have been diagnosed with COVID-19 after at least seven days passed since the shot.” ^^^^^Look here ^^^^^^^^

For the slow readers this means 1.1 million have gotten boosters. And 0.2% still presented active cob is 7 days after their third shot that’s in plain English.

In absolute terms, the number of virus carriers who received their third dose is 2,790. Of them, just 187 (0.01%) were hospitalized and 88 (0.008%) developed serious symptoms. Fewer than 15 of them have died, with the report offering no exact number.”

Do you understand what absolute terms means? That is in science for total numbers. In this case of the 0.2% who caught covid 7 days after their third shot remember this is referenced to the preceding scientific fact. That absolute number was 2790, of which out of that absolute number 88 were in serious condition and 15 died.

This should be freshmen level reading comprehension. I have now posted twice the correct data and numbers.

If you have a direct source contradicting this article’s source with a patient day breakdown please post it. If you are attempting to show that this article is in patient days you are flat out wrong. It’s.posted twice in plain English I won’t argue a point that anyone with basic reading comprehension skills can see for themselves.


42 posted on 08/22/2021 6:08:37 PM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
These people should be in that window, with HIGHER titers. They should have ~full protection. Why don't they?

Because it IS the antibodies that causes many of the reactions. Targeting the spike protein was idiotic. Totally idiotic. They did this because it was the easiest thing to do (mRNA encoding the spike protein). There are many reasons why having high antibody levels against the spike protein could be pathological. There are also reasons why targeting only this viral protein will not lead to the most robust anti-Covid response.

43 posted on 08/22/2021 6:08:58 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13
"To be fair, the author says the denominator is in “patient days” in an effort to spin this."

If true, that's makes the author's credibility even lower.

It makes zero sense to divide the number of patients by patient days. The opposite would make sense, patient days / # patients = average patient days per patient. But it's way too soon to calculate that, as few patients would have been discharged by now.

If the author doesn't understand how to use the numbers, does he even understand what the numbers he is using represents? My guess is no, and this article should not be taken seriously.

44 posted on 08/22/2021 6:10:55 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cameraeye

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/29/world/middleeast/israel-third-shot-covid-vaccine.html

Pfizer boosters


45 posted on 08/22/2021 6:11:55 PM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I’m getting Pfizer #3 ASAP.

I’ve posted here almost every day since May 1998, so if I stop the truth will be out.


46 posted on 08/22/2021 6:12:31 PM PDT by Jim Noble (The nation cannot be saved until the GOP is destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

Not a word.


47 posted on 08/22/2021 6:14:20 PM PDT by Qiviut (Faith is the antidote to fear. Mindset: be a victor, not a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
I think Berenson is trying to stir up fear. The original article reports that of the 1.1 million people vaccinated 3X, in other words those who have had a booster shot, some of them have tested positive for the COVID-19 virus.

Of the 1.1 million people, 2790 tested positive for COVID-19. 187 of those people ended up getting sick enough to end up in the hospital. 88 are really sick, and some number less than 15 have died.

There is not enough information yet to know how effective the booster shot is because the risk of potential infection in unknown over time. If the current rate reflects its performance against a widespread circulating virus then it is working well. That may be exactly what is happening in Israel.

For example, if all of the 1.1 million people were exposed to the virus then the 3X vaccine is 99.9998 percent effective in keeping people exposed to COVID-19 out of the hospital.

If only 10% of the 1.1 million people were exposed to the virus then the 3X vaccine is 99.9983 percent effective in keeping people exposed to COVID-19 out of the hospital.

If only 1% of the 1.1 million vaccinated people were exposed to the virus then the 3X vaccine is 99.983 percent effective in keeping people exposed to COVID-19 out of the hospital.

Note that knowing the percentage of the population exposed to the virus is important. If only 1% of the population is even exposed to the virus then 99 percent of the population would not get sick regardless of the existence or effect of the vaccine at all.

It would be helpful if the media and governments shared more useful data with the public.

48 posted on 08/22/2021 6:14:21 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tatown

The twitter author is incorrectly quoting patient days it makes sense now why you think it’s patient days. The actual source article and the real data is not patient days it’s 7 days OR MORE after they third booster shot. Again let’s look at the real source not some twitter idiot.

“But early data from the Health Ministry aired by Channel 12 news Sunday evening appears to show that those who have received a third vaccine dose are highly protected against the disease. According to the data, just 0.2% of the first 1.1 million Israelis who got their booster dose have been diagnosed with COVID-19 after at least seven days passed since the shot.”

It’s right there:

“diagnosed with COVID-19 after AT LEAST seven days passed since the shot.”

That means 7 days and more not just 7 days or every 7 days it makes a critical difference.


49 posted on 08/22/2021 6:18:34 PM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

Typo for the example of 11,000 exposures and 187 hospitalizations. The 3X vaccine effectiveness in that case is 98.3 percent. (187/11,000)


50 posted on 08/22/2021 6:21:26 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

51 posted on 08/22/2021 6:53:27 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

RE: Up to 15 Israelis who are a week out from the third dose have already died? 88 are very sick?

Out of how many millions vaccinated?

Second question.... did they compare these number of deaths and sicknesses with those who are unvaccinated?


52 posted on 08/22/2021 6:54:07 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

The tweets are poorly worded. But 187 / 2,790 * 100 = 6.7%, not 0.01%.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Berenson took the quote right from the article. The government quote (more provax pr) was calculated from all 1.1 million (now 1.3 million) people who got the 3rd shot.

The illness, death and case numbers referred to ONLY those who had tested positive for covid at least one week after the 3rd shot. Leave aside for the moment the idiocy in using a one week time frame to contract covid. Obviously many more of the 1.1 million will contract it in subsequent months.


53 posted on 08/22/2021 7:12:46 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Math must be very hard for these people. 187 people out of 2790 is 6.7%. not .01%. And 88 out of 2790 is 3.1%, not .0088%


54 posted on 08/22/2021 8:09:42 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
Berenson took the quote right from the article. The government quote (more provax pr) was calculated from all 1.1 million (now 1.3 million) people who got the 3rd shot.

So Berenson references the number of people 'carrying the virus'  2790, and of them, how many severely ill, how many hospitalized.

The illness, death and case numbers referred to ONLY those who had tested positive for covid at least one week after the 3rd shot. Obviously many more of the 1.1 million will contract it in subsequent months - 1 week is too soon to have these kinds of numbers.

55 posted on 08/22/2021 8:15:16 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

All the mRNA vaccine test animals when exposed to a “wild” variant had cytokine storms and died.


56 posted on 08/22/2021 8:15:19 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

DAYS = 10
First boosters to those over 60 started July 30.
1.8 million administered. 22% unvaccinated although a reuters article claims only 11%, or about a million, remain unvaccinated.

After ‘at least a week”:
“Some 37 people tested positive for coronavirus after their third jab, compared with 1,064 positive cases among those who had received only two doses”

As of last Wednesday: “per 100,000 people, showed 172 serious cases among unvaccinated people over 60, compared with 21 serious cases”

“Breaking down statistics from Israel’s Gertner Institute and KI Institute, ministry officials said that among people aged 60 and over, the protection against infection provided from 10 days after a third dose was four times higher than after two doses.

A third jab for over 60-year-olds offered five to six times greater protection after 10 days with regard to serious illness and hospitalisation.”

https://news.yahoo.com/israel-finds-covid-19-vaccine-185537259.html
and:
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/third-pfizer-dose-86-effective-over-60s-israeli-hmo-says-2021-08-18/


57 posted on 08/22/2021 8:19:21 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
A third jab for over 60-year-olds offered five to six times greater protection after 10 days with regard to serious illness and hospitalisation.”


58 posted on 08/22/2021 8:55:59 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Both your links are Reuters. No need for Reuters to ‘wash’ the data for me - all MSM has touches of bias, Reuters is strong for their habit of slanting the data to fit ‘the narrative.’


59 posted on 08/22/2021 9:23:43 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Yea, the number of infected is a meaningless number after only a week or two. The 6.7% figure is interesting, what is the percentage of hospitalized to the number infected in the unvaccinated population in Israel?


60 posted on 08/22/2021 9:30:31 PM PDT by freespirit2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson