Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: x
They didn’t endorse or campaign for Biden. The “Against Trump” issue came out in January 2016 when a lot of people were still skeptical about Trump and assumed he wasn’t a serious candidate.

Right.

National Review Oct 2020: Hell No! The Case Against Trump

To balance this, they had another essay to reflect the "pro" side of Donald Trump. It begins like this: "I know what I think of Donald Trump. I think that he’s a shallow, ignorant, capricious, incorrigible, self-destructive fool."

They were NOT neutral in 2020.

18 posted on 08/21/2021 9:07:58 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie; TTFlyer
That was one of a series of articles, accompanied with this disclaimer:

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National Review editorial board as a whole.

Once again: "These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National Review editorial board as a whole."

The original articles were "Yes," "No," and "Maybe." Williamson threw in the "Hell, No" article of his own just to muddy the waters.

21 posted on 08/21/2021 9:18:36 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson