Is not to "infringe" on the power of the Legislature, the very purpose of the Ballot Proposition process?
1 posted on
08/20/2021 7:06:52 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Californians have wasted so much money, time, and energy on ballot propositions that the courts eventually throw out well after they have been approved by the voters.
2 posted on
08/20/2021 7:09:00 PM PDT by
CatOwner
(Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021)
To: BenLurkin
Someone tell me why California has ballot propositions at all? Don't the people know that the courts make all the rules, not ordinary citizens.
3 posted on
08/20/2021 7:10:33 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
("Success is 10 percent inspiration and 90 percent perspiration." — Thomas Edison)
To: BenLurkin
Yup...these are liberal luddites...must support the unions...no matter how incompetent or inefficient...progress and choice be damned
4 posted on
08/20/2021 7:14:27 PM PDT by
davisdoug
To: BenLurkin
5 posted on
08/20/2021 7:17:19 PM PDT by
davisdoug
To: BenLurkin
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch ruled that parts of Proposition 22 are unconstitutional because they infringe on the power of the Legislature to include app-based drivers under the state’s workers’ compensation law.Wait, what? So this agenda-driven tool found a penumbra in the Kali Constipation that says there's no such thing as independent contractors???
6 posted on
08/20/2021 7:19:12 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: BenLurkin
infringe on the power of the Legislature
If these liberals exercised that power,I wonder if that would help bring about a Gov Elder?
7 posted on
08/20/2021 7:21:56 PM PDT by
Mark
(Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? Homer Simpson)
To: BenLurkin
Is not to "infringe" on the power of the Legislature, the very purpose of the Ballot Proposition process? Yes. So I thought.
8 posted on
08/20/2021 7:24:11 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
To: BenLurkin
Is this gig or fig? I’m so confused.
9 posted on
08/20/2021 7:26:51 PM PDT by
LastDayz
(A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
To: BenLurkin
Prop 187...Where after winning big, they burned the ballots and declared the election of the people, illegal.
10 posted on
08/20/2021 7:33:52 PM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: BenLurkin
11 posted on
08/20/2021 7:35:51 PM PDT by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
To: BenLurkin
Corrupt judges doing favors in exchange for public employee union campaign contributions. Standard Operating Procedure in California. The corruption runs deep. SEIU about owns the politicians in California.
12 posted on
08/20/2021 7:49:00 PM PDT by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
To: BenLurkin
I have mixed feelings about this. The gig economy really does violate the law, and the only way they got away with it was because they got enough venture capital funding that they could flood the market before the city and state governments knew what was happening.
Similar to how Amazon got away with murder by declaring itself a "poor widdle internet company" that shouldn't be expected to collect sales tax.
YouTube is littered with videos of how hard it is to make a living, or even make a profit, being an Uber/Lyft driver. The turnover is very high.
In the short run this might be bad for the consumer or the little guy trying to make a few bucks on the side, but in the long run if this makes even more people mad at Democrats then it will be a cloud with a silver lining.
To: BenLurkin
Wow. The California Constitution says that the People, collectively, are the sovereign. The Legislature derives it’s power from the People. The portions of the constitution providing for referendum explicitly state that it is the People’s exercise of their sovereign power. Plainly wrongly decided. This will not stand
14 posted on
08/20/2021 8:10:28 PM PDT by
j.havenfarm
(20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: BenLurkin
Excellent point!
What a moronic ruling by a county judge. I’m sure this will be appealed.
17 posted on
08/20/2021 11:31:15 PM PDT by
aquila48
(Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you. )
To: BenLurkin
parts of Proposition 22 are unconstitutional because they infringe on the power of the Legislature
= = =
????
23 posted on
08/21/2021 12:17:48 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson